JBroadway said: "I don't necessarily want to weigh in on Peterson's tweets, because I think it's complicated, and I can see arguments on both sides.
But this whole logic of "he's angry about something that hasn't even been announced" doesn't really make sense. Even without Boroff's piece, it had been widely rumored, somewhat credibly, for months now. And I think Boroff's piece pretty much solidifies that the rumors are true, even if the show ultimately fails to capitalize, and move forward as planned.
At this point, I think it's fairly safe to assume that Groban and Ashford have been cast. So you can either be angry about the casting, or not be angry about the casting; you can either see merit of Peterson's takes, or not see merit in his takes (or have mixed feelings, like me, of course). But this whole business of mocking his outrage simply because it's "not even official yet" strikes me as a misassessment of the actual situation as it stands.
"
But it isn't official. He's still raising capital. Is it pretty damn close to official? Hell yeah. Is it official? No.
Also...
Unless this was being billed as a "historically all-POC production of SWEENEY TODD", I don't see how you can be outraged that two people are possibly going to star in a revival if they raise the money. There's a lot of other incredible roles in the show to be cast. Must we start saying "every lead in a classic musical now needs to be played by a POC or we'll be outraged"? I absolutely want to see more diversity on our stages - and believe we are starting to - but when 2 roles of an ensemble musical are announced (still unofficially, I might add), I'm not sure how one can start accusing the production of not being diverse enough. I can think of quite a few POC performers I'd like to see: Phillip Boykin is at the top of that list. Thom Sesma was thrilling at Barrow Street, and I'd love to see him do it again. While she may be a bit young, I think Danielle Brooks would make a marvelous Mrs. Lovett and Ruthie Ann Miles a devastating Beggar Woman. I I just don't see the point in outrage at this stage. I know we don't always see eye to eye, JBroadway, but I don't think my saying that makes me the tone deaf, privileged clown he's tried to portray me as.
And to back up Distinctive Baritone, I think we can expect Kail to helm a diverse production.
I guess I also feel that Peterson simply wants to be outraged because it makes his blog more dynamic to read. For a guy who claims to love the theatre, his blog often seems very devoted to tearing it down.
*shrug*
"I know now that theatre saved my life." - Susan Stroman