I should clear something up. We've been debating two things really ... whether or not any work should be shifted to a different setting in the general sense ... and whether or not this specific show, The Music Man, should be set in the 1930s.
Several of you have been advocating that "experimentation is a good thing!" My reaction wasn't to the general "cause," but to a specific experiment. I would have the same reaction if you smeared peanut butter on a lightbulb and tried to eat it. An ill-advised experiment, to be sure.
My earlier posts say I'm not against trying something different "in general," as long as there is thought behind it and it makes sense and/or brings a new perspective to the work. Admittedly, I don't usually like them, and I may be predisposed against them, but I'm not flatly opposed to them. My prejudice is based on history, which has shown me that most experiments of this nature are usually misguided if they're even guided at all.
And I'm not opposed to "fantasy" or fiction either. I write in that genre myself. But the best fantasies have some footing in reality. As soon as you establish a setting, you live by those rules, whatever they may be, whether they are in Middle Earth or the Middle West during the Great Depression.
The worst fantasies establish setting and character and then break their own rules or muddle them at will.
If this director had found a way to make The Music Man work by setting it in 1930s Iowa during the Great Depression that would be fine. I maintain it can't be done unless you rewrite the book and lyrics. As is, the words (book and lyrics), situations, and ideals would never fit into that era.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22