OhHiii said: "a12la said: "OhHiii said: "YvanEhtNioj said: "I'm excited for them! But i do wish they replaced a couple people who read as a little younger. As a while, this cast doesn't pass for high schoolers to me unlike Prom or Mean Girls."
In the same vein of You're A Good Man Charlie Brown and Spelling Bee, there are youth-centric shows that deliberately cast people who read as adults as an artistic choice to help make the themes more apparent. In Be More Chill's case, I'd guessthat's what they intended. It's not like there's a shortage of younger looking actors."
There really isn't anything in the show to suggest that. It would work much better with actual young actors (unlike Spelling Bee and Charlie Brown)."
As a post stated earlier, the show wouldn't be palatable watching actual teenagers or actors who read as teenagers partaking in what happens throughout the show. And there's one single adult in the cast. If you don't think they made that choice consciously, you're wrong."
In an older thread, there was extensive discussion of the apparent age of the cast versus the supposed age of the characters. It's interesting how much of an issue is being made of this when it's really quite common on Broadway. Rarely do teenage characters actually look their age, and sometimes even the inverse is true - in Phantom, the title character is actually supposed to be in his 40s, but has been played for quite some time now by actors far younger than that (even 20s). Similarly, Christine is supposed to be in her late teens or very early 20s, but she's typically played by actresses in their late 20s and even into their 30s. And there are few members of the ballet chorus who could pass for late teens in even the most forgiving light.
I'm not saying it doesn't impede suspension of disbelief for me, but this sort of casting is hardly unique to Be More Chill.
==> this board is a nest of vipers <==
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene"
- Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage