AEA AGMA SM said: "Re:Chicago'sstop clause, or lack thereof. Just because a show has a stop clause it doesn't necessarily mean that it is always invoked by the landlords. Sure, if there is a potential super high grossing show that desperately wants a specific theatre, such as the case was withBeetlejuice, The Music Manand the Winter Garden, then of course it's going to be exercised. But, especially withChicago, the reality is that nobody is clamoring to get into the Ambassador. Would it get filled (after a renovation) shouldChicagoclose? Of course, because there will always be some projects where scheduling becomes more important than location, but the fact remains that prior toChicagomoving in that theatre had a pretty large string of short-lived productions that only lasted a few months, with the one notable exception beingBring in 'Da Noisein the mid-90s.
So even if they had a stop clause and fell below it, which I'm sure they would have in some of their leaner weeks in between the big name stunt and star castings, it's proven far more lucrative to the Shuberts to leave them there and let them chug along than a string of short-lived flops would have."
Chicago will keep playing and all that jazz ...no plans closing as it cost the Weissler's nada at this point to keep it going at the Ambassador. Can't believe Fran is 95!? Pamela Andersonn gave it a big bump. They want her back, I hear but she's not interested in doing it all again.
"Anything you do, let it it come from you--then it will be new."
Sunday in the Park with George