Brooklyn Opens on Broadway Tomorrow - — Page 2
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:33am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:44am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:46am
Brooklyn has great talent, but that is all it has sadly.
Ramona Keller is a star.
Hope she is cast in Dreamgirls soon.
Updated On: 10/21/04 at 10:46 AM
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:48am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:48am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:53am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:57am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 10:58am
I thought the cast were very talented.
I just thought it was a waste, as the cast are so talented.
Updated On: 10/21/04 at 10:58 AM
Posted: 10/21/04 at 11:09am
Amneris, who knew you were funny?
Corine, you haven't answered my question. I'm not being mean, I sincerely want to know why you think a concert version of a score you don't like would be better
Posted: 10/21/04 at 11:26am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 11:40am
if the bash Bklyn...who cares...Those actors are all outstanding and I hope they survive regardless...
Posted: 10/21/04 at 11:48am
The story did not work. But I liked the singers.
I actually like Margo Channing's idea better.
To put them in a different show.
Posted: 10/21/04 at 11:58am
Posted: 10/21/04 at 12:00pm
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:24pm
Brooklyn, on the other hand, desperately needs a VERY positive slate of reviews. It is heavily discounted and still can't crack 70% in weekly attendance. Perhaps some in the audience will find it charming, but others are going to wonder why the heck they spent $100 (or even $55) for a show with sets and costumes made out of trash and a cast of 5. Word of mouth has been "mixed" at best and if Brantley pans the show (the only review that really counts), there goes the over-35 NYC and suburban audience, which every show MUST have to be able to run.
You can't compare Wicked to Brooklyn -- they are two COMPLETELY different shows and are in two totally different situations.
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:31pm
While some of your thinking is spot-on, I think if the VERY mediocre production of "Fiddler" can bring in the 35+ suburban crowd, BKLYN should be able to do the same, reviews be damned!
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:43pm
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:44pm
I'd never seen Fiddler before, and I didn't love this production, but I liked it well enough and have to admit that I got choked up once or twice just hearing those songs and seeing the classic Robbins choreography performed live.
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:45pm
Brooklyn is a totally brand new show by a totally unknown creative team and a totally unknown (to people who don't frequent theatre chat boards) cast. It has no awards, no history, no movie tie-in, no "ethnic" appeal, and no one affiliated with it that anyone has ever heard of. If, on top of that, the reviews are terrible, give me one reason why that same 35+ suburban crowd would be interested in hiring babysitters, driving all the way into the city, paying for parking and then shelling out $100 a piece to see this show?
Updated On: 10/21/04 at 01:45 PM
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:46pm
Duh.
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:47pm
I did feel like the only one who cared that it was Kristen & Idina (i did hear 'joel gray'stated a lot during intermission!)
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:57pm
While, yes, it did have a discount code available (that's how I saw it) attendance numbers were:
-- Week ending 10/12/03 (1st week of previews) -- 98.9% capacity
-- Week ending 10/19/03 (2nd week of previews) -- 96.6% capacity
-- Week ending 10/26/03 (3rd week of previews) -- 99.2% capacity
As I said, the show started out as a box office phenomenon from the very first preview and continues to be one to this day.
Box Office Grosses
Posted: 10/21/04 at 1:59pm
Posted: 10/21/04 at 2:01pm
BroadwayWorld TV