BroadwayRox3588 said: "All I will say is this. In general, I consider myself pro-union. However, if these unions are going to object to a booster mandate, just to start petty, inconsequential arguments, I might have to rethink that position."
10000000%. It’s interesting how this situation draws similarities with the Chicago schools situation. The teacher’s Union is rejecting concessions unless they include PCR testing for every single student every single week, a system that exactly ZERO school districts in the country have in place. Now, like the League with workers and audiences, Chicago’s municipal government has failed both teachers and students. That much is clear. But we’re living in a different reality with omicron than we have the past two years. I also get it takes time to recalibrate fear, etc.
But at the end of the day, education must happen one way or another, much like you must have audience members buying tickets to continue operating a show. It’s basic economics. Much like legal right to a certain number of paid sick leave days, I wonder if there’s a solution that says shows pay 100% or salaries for paused performances up to a certain number of cancelled performances, and tier down salaries from there for additional pauses. At the end of the day, paying full salaries when not a soul is working in the theatre due to a cancellation isn’t tenable and a whole heck of a lot more people will be completely out of work rather than taking a concession. Which, by the way, concessions are VERY common when a show is financially struggling, so this hard no mentality against making concessions outright now doesn’t quite square.
EDIT: to clarify, though, this is not to give a pass to productions providing inadequate testing that adheres to recommended protocols at the bare minimum.
Updated On: 1/8/22 at 09:53 AM