"If you knew who either was, (much less read either), you might understand the difference."
One's a French symbolist and critic, and the other a French philosopher and social critic. I'd say name-dropping either in a discussion that doesn't even remotely involve their fields is pretentious. And don't you always get bent out of shape when someone supposedly makes an assumption about you?
"not the vacuous namedropping of some pathetic wannabe-cool musical."
I was referring to your own criticism of said musical, actually. And your own hypocrisy, which knows no bounds and deepens with every smug statement you deign to share.
"I wholly understand though, all this completely beyond the ken of someone whose conception of good theatre is Nobody Loves You."
Except I specifically said I did NOT think it was great theatre and that it was a fine diversion.
And please, you post rapturously of the most trifling pieces of musical theatre from the 30s.
Wine gets better with age. Unless something goes wrong and it turns into vinegar, which seems to be the case with you.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."