This discussion is almost archetypical BWW: "I admire the ambitions, yet had specific problems with {musical theater craft point X} and {staging issue Y}" is rebutted with "But this is the most significant topic of this particular moment in history, so take a seat with any of those nitpicky reservations!"
This syndrome has occurred repeatedly, usually around one show per season (the failed Paradise Square invited it, to name but one recent example, but Come From Away, a hit, inspired commentary over the entire run). This strange idea persists: that topicality, historic atrocity and/or sociopolitical ideas, and the emotions they engender, render any criticism moot and unwelcome. This board has always invited in-depth analysis and a healthy climate of critique; it's not a fan page but a safe place for serious conversations about theatrical forms, the marketplace, art and commerce. It's fascinating that some still self-appoint as arbiters of the correct purpose of these postings. We come to share, to listen, to pit our reactions against others'. No topic, no global tragedy, make artistic explorations criticism free. Arguably, the greater the significance of the theme or historical event, the more scrutiny the show warrants.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 11/11/23 at 05:07 PM