Well, to be honest, we have Johnny Depp to thank for Disney giving this movie the green light.
Even Meryl Streep as the Witch wasn't enough for Disney to bite. That's because they're spending some bucks on it (you would have to, given the material).
It was only when Depp signed on as the Wolf (probably because of his association with Rob Marshall after the last Pirates movie). Maybe Marshall even called him for a "favor" and said, 'Pretty please! It's a great part, but it's fairly small."
Either way, when they had Marshall, Streep ... and DEPP, Disney finally said yes.
I"m thrilled about it, honestly. And I have no ill will against Depp, who probably thought the role looked cool (which it does) and that he would do a good job with it (which I believe he will). I'm sure it sounded like a lot of fun. Plus he obviously likes working with Marshall (and Disney).
He's probably being WAY overpaid for his part, but with him as a "star," they will get all kinds of extra publicity ... so it's a "good investment."
I remember when Marlon Brando signed on for Superman. It was a tiny roll, and his salary was obscene, but what he did was lend a huge name and a bit of "movie star legitimacy" to the whole thing. And it worked, big-time.
I also believe that with Streep and Depp in place, they were able to (fairly easily) lure other star talent, like Chris Pine and Anna Kendrick. It became a very hot project.
So for that, I tip my hat to Johnny Depp. I love that he didn't HAVE to be the lead in a movie. I love the cast they've assembled. I love that Disney will probably throw an obscene amount of money at it (both for production and publicity).
But yeah, it's a bit annoying when the media keeps calling it a "Johnny Depp" film. It's not like Disney is doing that. But he's a "shiny" name, and people love shiny names.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 9/6/13 at 04:48 PM