Broadway Legend Joined: 6/11/07
HUGE EXPECTIONS when it was announced.
Mediocre reviews.
Ticket prices that are WAY too high.
Where are the discounts for this show? No way this could be selling that well already.
Last I heard, they were selling pretty well actually.
How could it not be selling well. The Addams Family is an widely recognized franchise... at least in the U.S anyways... and then you also have to take into consideration two people named Bebe Neuwirth, and Nathan Lane.
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/11/07
Young Frankenstein was also a widely recognized franchise. It was Mel Brooks' follow up to The Producers. Was the most anticipated show of that year. Starred some big Broadway names also.
In my office, I'm the guy that everyone goes to when they want to know about theater (obviously).
The one show that everyone has been asking me about is THE ADDAMS FAMILY. Regardless of how good or bad the reviews were in Chicago, there is definite buzz about this show among people who are not regular theater-goers. I definitely think it will sell well...at least for a few months. I do hope the issues from Chicago can be fixed and that the show is a hit. I'll be there on the 8th, 16th and 31st. I will keep the baord informed of any changes I notice.
Eek, I hope not. That was way too painful to sit through.
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/12/09
Young Frankenstein was one movie. Addams' Family is a comic, 2 movies, a cartoon, TV show. It's been engrained in the society for many many years. I'd wager it that has more draw than Young Frankenstein.
BTW, Young Frank had it's ticket prices set BEFORE it was even in front of a paying audience.
"big Broadway names" but only one marginally household-ish name.
"AF" has 2x the marginally household names of "YF" and I'd venture more "brand recognition."
Yeah, the only name in Young Frankenstein that would be even slightly recognizable to any passerby would be Megan Mullally.
Broadway Legend Joined: 1/19/06
And even in that case would be hard to recognize, really.
Everyone knows Nathan Lane, either by face and name or a character. My 13 year old cousin finds him hillarious, after I dragged him to The Producers Movie when he was 9. He never looked at "old ladies" the same after that.
Bebe Neuwirth isn't really a household name outside the tri-state area. "You know, what's her name, Fraiser's ex on Cheers" isn't going to sell that many tickets to tourists.
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/11/07
I hate to break it to you all....but neither of the leads are massive names to most of the country that doesn't follow Broadway.
Bebe's as much a household name as Megan Mullaly -- actually more.
Nathan Lane could take a crap on stage and it would sell out every night. Updated On: 2/22/10 at 12:43 AM
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/12/09
I hate to break it to you all....but neither of the leads are massive names to most of the country that doesn't follow Broadway.
And yet The Producers sold out every time he came back to the show...
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/11/07
Wrong....one word - NOVEMBER.
I don't understand this thread at all.
Young Frankenstein DID have a specific wrong path, but it was one of Hubris. Of treating group ticket sales as second class citizens. Of a creator who ignored the input and advice of others. Of source material that was much more suited to film than to stage than The Producers.
None of these issues apply to Addams Family. Addams Family has some challenges ahead, but they are apples and oranges to what Young Frankenstein was dealing with.
Bebe's as much a household name as Megan Mullaly -- actually more.
Completely disagree. "Household name" means all households, not just musical theatre fan households. The average American would recognize Karen from Will & Grace before they would Lilith from Fraiser.
I could walk out my front door here in Australia, and at least 95 out of the 100 people would know who both those names above the title are.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/25/08
Since the Marquee has been put up at every show I have gone to I have heard someone mention "Nathan Lane and Bebe Neurwith in The Addams Family" ...their names get the job done.
And don't forget Terrance Mann! (In our household anyway....)
I remember being at the US Open one summer and there was a rain delay. They were showing shots of people in the crowd on the jumbotron and there was a shot of Bebe. My first thought was of her in the original revival cast of Chicago. However, my dad pointed her out to me as if I didn't know who she was and said that she was from Cheers.
I responded that I knew who she was due to the fact that I knew that she was on Broadway. So, with that, I do think that there is not enough credit given to her on her ability to sell tickets or as to how big her name is.
I just want to add something. I don't think that November didn't sell well due to Nathan Lane being in the play. I think that it didn't sell well due to the fact that it wasn't Mammet's best work and got mediocre reviews at best.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
You know what would make a great musical? All the threads bitching about Adams Family!
Actually Joe, that is all part of act III of Broadwayworld the musical. I am surprised you didn't get the memo on that one.
Stand-by Joined: 4/22/08
A couple of years ago, I was out with friends at a bar/lounge in Boston. Nathan Lane came in alone (he was in town with "Butley"), and seated himself at a table that was probably the most "high profile" spot in the room -- he was obviously there to be noticed.
But the sad thing was, no one recognized him at all. I was close enough to overhear his conversation as he attempted to "chat up" a few guys, but none of them had any idea who they were talking to.
So, while Nathan Lane is a huge star in theater circles, I don't think he's a "household name" in the world beyond. Personally, I think he's famous enough to get a show noticed by major media beyond the normal theater world outlets, but not a big enough name to single-handedly guarantee a show's success. (I think the same of Neuwirth as well.)
Videos