It Shoulda Been You Previews — Page 2
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:53pm
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 10:53 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:55pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:57pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:59pm
Really the entire first portion doesn't hold much water after learning the twist and the explanation is so convoluted and unbelievable that I well, don't believe it.
Philly, I did see Honeymoon in Vegas and enjoyed it quite a bit. It's not perfect, but I liked the score and Rob McClure a lot. I think it will have an uphill battle getting a Best Musical nomination, though only Holler is less likely to get nominated than It Shoulda Been You.
Mac, luckily my ticket only cost me $14 too.
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 10:59 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:59pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:06pm
jnb9872, a prediction about a nomination is about OTHER peoples opinions!!
I don't have much of an opinion on this show since i haven't seen it yet! Other people's opinions don't sway me! If they did, then I would have hated Honeymoon in Vegas
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:09pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:10pm
I don't block anyone and can skip read but this 'look at me I'm in print' mentality shows youthful exuberance which this oldie finds exhausting !
Carry on regardless--back to my reading and warm milk.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:12pm
I can understand why Holler attempted coming to Broadway. They thought they had a winning jukebox musical formula, believed in Tupac's music and thought they were bringing something different to Broadway. On paper it could have worked, but the execution was all wrong.
It Shoulda Been You is an embarrassment, but one that you can laugh at.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:13pm
Whizzer, comparing this to HOLLER seems unfortunate for all parties involved: but are you saying its chances are better than HOLLER because the show is still better than that was, or because of its positioning in the season/appeal to likely voters being more advantageous even with worse material?
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 11:13 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:19pm
And to echo SweetLips - philly, I genuinely appreciate your enthusiastic view on all things theatre around here, but please, your hijacking of nearly every thread recently has really been quite a distraction. I've never muted anyone on this board and I don't plan on it, but constantly badgering other users and going back and forth with other posters is just unnecessary.
Did anyone stage door?
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:19pm
"Do you think that "opinions" only refer to shows and "predictions" only refer to nominations? Because your opinions about the nominations and predictions about shows' award chances have been sadly emphatic."
NO i think that an opinion is what I think. A prediction is what I think others think
greasedlighting, ummmm and yet i wasn't on the boards at all last week
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 11:19 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:21pm
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 11:21 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:21pm
Holler opened at the worst possible time in the season and will likely receive zero nominations, and I'm not even saying that it deserves any, but it was ambitious. It tried. The creators really wanted to say something relevant and be something new. They didn't find the right way to pull it off, but they gave it their best shot.
It Shoulda Been You feels like a NYMF show that with low expectations could provide some campy fun. It certainly is trying to appeal to an older ticket buying demographic that could afford a $120 orchestra seat, whereas Holler's younger target demographic probably wouldn't have been able to pay more than $35 for a seat.
GreasedLightnight, I agree that they set out to just be light entertainment and whatnot, at least until the twist happened. Then things kind of went topsy-turvy and the show morphed into something else.
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 11:21 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:23pm
I also, to this day, will never understand Holler's decision to move into one of the largest theaters on Broadway merely weeks after the previous seasons Tony's. If they had waited, done some extra work on the show and came in closer to now, I wonder how they would have fared this season in terms of new musicals.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:23pm
I have no idea if this show is good or bad - and certainly a few tweets doesn't make or break a show. Nor does it give me any indication of whether a show will receive a Tony nomination for Best Musical.
Whizzer could be right or alone - For example, given the positive comments on this board about Hunchback at Papermill, it was a surprise to me that it recieved less than rave reviews from the press.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:27pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:31pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:32pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:32pm
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 11:32 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:33pm
Edit: it's very difficult for five musicals to be nominated. The votes would have to fall just so that the difference between the fourth and fifth nominee is separated by three votes or less (I believe). It's just like it's basically impossible for the Academy to nominate 10 best picture nominees under the current system.
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 11:33 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:39pm
BroadwayWorld TV