Posted: 6/23/22 at 6:23am
WestEndGal said: "
“The New York Timesstates the show was "panned by critics" in London, as it "received reviews that were mostly lukewarm at best."
Despite this, it sounds like a loud, colorful blast. Let's see how audiences react when this hits NY."
This absolutely infuriates me because &Juliet wasn’t panned by critics at all and generally got good reviews! It also won 3 performance Olivier Awards. The NY Times should do better.
The Independent - 4 stars; The Guardian (Gregory Robinson) - 4 stars; Evening Standard - 4 stars; London Box Office - 4 stars; Time Out - 4 stars; WhatsOnStage - 5 stars; The Stage - 5 stars
I hope this show does well because it was such a fun night out when I went, and I also think it’s the type of show Broadway needs right now. Yes it’s silly but it doesn’t try to be anything it’s not, and it does what it’s trying to do well - it has catchy tunes, and it’s a modernised take on Romeo & Juliet without being pretentious about it."
I think part of the "West End Critics dismissed & Juliet" narrative is based on the fact that Michael Billington and Tim Walker (Two of the most famous West End Critics) gave negative reviews, but the fact that & Juliet got ANY acclaim - let alone 7 major reviewers giving it 4 stars or more - is quite an achievement in the Jukebox musical subgenre. & Juliet had the potential to be a West End disaster, but has carved out a pretty strong niche for itself...
I'm not sure Lorna Courtney or Betsey Wolfe will emulate the Oliver Awards victories of Miriam Teak-Lee and Cassidy Janson, but they have a good chance of getting a nomination. And as we learned this year, critical hostility towards a production will not stop the standout leads from getting their hands on the Tony...