SeanD2 said: "Is it just me or is it a bit scary the emphasis the theater community is putting on the Jimmy Awards at this point? These are high school kids in what's supposed to be educational theater."
Honestly, I have felt a similar unease about the Jimmy Awards. Don't get me wrong, it's valuable and important to uplift the talents of people at this age. Other high school pursuits can lead to a national stage (I think of televised HS baseball or cheerleading) and can act as a avenue towards a professional career or higher education - it's great to have something like that for theatre.
However, I can't help but see the Jimmys as exacerbating inequities that already exist in this industry. To perform at that level, or to have the awareness to do so, in what should be an educational setting often requires extra training and connections that many can't afford. It requires going to the right, appropriately funded high school that can put on productions of the right caliber AND get noticed by the community at large, a school that hasn't left its arts department to wither, which is rare in the US. Even schools that are well-off financially can disregard theatre, or a school's leadership within its theatre department can often be mismanaged or be exclusive.
I also wonder if the pressure to have kids go through this funnel will create a "sameness" in upcoming generations of performers the way, in my opinion, that some undergrad MT programs do. But I'm rambling now.
The Jimmys have produced some of my favorite talent in recent years no doubt. And there's obviously no easy way to fix or even address those concerns above. But they will continue to keep me from putting 100% of my support behind them until it becomes more widely acknowledged.