TheatreFan4 said: "soxboy22 said: "Agreed, though actors have withdrawn from shows voluntarily if they felt they are not up to snuff. Especially with Broadway’s first revival of Funny Girl….fans are so “protective” of it."
It should not be on the actor to do the job of a producer. Especially when I'm sure they spent all the rehearsals gassing her up, why would she step down?"
Of course. Again, a perfectly sane take that should be the normal response to an actress' inability to sing a role. She spent months being told by directors and producers that she was doing great. Her reviews werent even bad---I remember the NYT hit the nail on the head: shes good not great, she cant save this creaky show, she doesnt have vocal power to carry it but does a fine job with what shes got--but this narrative unfolded that she was impossible to listen to (not at all), that she never came to work (wrong), that the whole cast hated her (demonstrably false), that she ruined the show (no, she was thrust center stage of an iconic role in a crappy show being given an even crappier revival).
i am not some huge beanie stan. the reaction to her was just so over the top hostile it turned comically ugly. and i dont dispute that Lea turned the show around in a role she was born to play! but even when re recognize that Lea can outsing Beanie, when we suggest that Beanie brought a warmth/humor to the role that Lea cant and doesnt-- out comes the mob to regale with tales about how Beanie ate live kittens on stage while lip synching the score.
I hope Lea feels better and gets to finish the run. I hope Lea gets another juicy role because her horrid personality should be irrelevant. I hope Beanie finds a way to return to the stage and wow in something better suited for her. i hope this is the end of trying to make Funny Girl into a classic- without Barbra, it aint.