I meant to ask earlier when I came across this bit of information in Ali Ewoldt's blog. Has Les Mis always had a slanted stage? There was a thread awhile back about shows that had slanted or raked stages, but I don't recall seeing Les Mis mentioned. Also, are there variations on how slanted the stage is?
Most Broadway musicals have a raked stage as it distorts and forces perspective upon the audience. Objects and people upstage appear bigger and closer then they really are. Raked stages however, put enormous stress on the cast & crew's knees and backs. And remeber since the stage is raked all furniture/set peices have to be counter-raked in order for things to be level.
Stages are built level. Some shows, Mamma Mia, Les Miz, and Wicked for example choose to employ raked stages.. Mamma Mia and Wicked, however, use level show decks on their current national tours (the 1st nat'l for Mia had a raked stage as well).
Equity has very strict regulations governing howed raked a stage can be.
Its funny you should mention that... Several years ago I was fortunate enough to be taken onstage by David Masenheimer, who played Javert at the time, and one of the first things he said was how terrible his posture was after working in Les Miserables...
For people who know more about raked stages, can you really tell a difference when you're just sitting in the audience? Raked stages seems like one of those absurd things that shouldn't happen, but does because people think it has an effect.
Was the deck raked for the national tour of Les Mis too?
"Chicago is it's own incredible theater town right there smack down in the middle of the heartland. What a great city! I can see why Oprah likes to live there!" - Dee Hoty :-D
I was just in a show with a raked stage, and most people said they couldn't really tell. I don't think it's really a stylistic choice? And I can imagine a turntable and a rake for Les Miz - that must suck for the actors.
What is the typical size of the slant, if there is a typical or average size for raked stages? Is it noticeable as an actor? Sorry, I really ought to refer back to the previous thread on this.
there isn't a typical/average. some shows have them, some do not. If they do, the size of rake depends on the show. I believe the maximum slant allowed by Equity is 1 inch of slant per foot. Yes, it is noticeable as an actor.
The raking of a stage improves overall sightlines for the audience. If you are sitting at eye-level with the stage, you would be able to see further back on the deck. If you happen to be in a seat that is just below eye-level with the stage, on an unraked stage, you'd miss the feet of the performers, or worse.
Raking a stage not only improves those sightlines, but it adds depth visually, and physically. A raked stage adds depth to shallow spaces.
millie, in order to SEE the rake, you have to take a picture from the SIDE of the show deck.. for the most part, that would be a VERY difficult thing to do without knocking out a wall
As a matter of fact, the theatre in London where Les Miz originally played DID have an actual raked stage WITH the double revolve, built nearly a hundred years ago. The set designer, John Napier, decided to incorporate the rake and the revolve rather than build a new "show deck". This meant that set pieces such as the barricade units could not be "tracked" through the stage floor - they had to be "free rolling". Each barricade unit has "driver" - a stage hand inside it, driving it like a parade float.
Jon, raking of the actual stage was a common feature of theatres LONG ago, primarily during the Restoration period I believe. It was then that fad was firced perspective scenery as well having teh audience seated on a flat floor (left over from the days of common standing room in Shakespearian/Elizabethan houses. Raked staged improved sightline for those audiences as well as helped achieved the forced perspective look.