Some people are gifted that way.
Chewey, you see that chess board in your icon? See that piece way over to the left and down a bit? The one that's alone?
That's you in regard to this topic.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/27/05
"You already know you'll do that before you even see it?"
Her singing in the soundtrack highlights was enough to make me do that already.
"But all of Europe and its colonies (think Washington and Bolivar) reeled in the wake of the Revolution of 1789,
The French Revolution came after the American Revolution. In fact, the French were inspired in part by the Americans to revolt."
Stagemanager, I caught my admittedly ridiculous oversight before you did and corrected myself. I changed Washington to Juarez.
Read more: https://forum.broadwayworld.com/readmessage.php?thread=1054750&page=11#ixzz2GNBrGPI9
No, you didn't 'cause it still said Washington and Bolivar when I copy/pasted and replied to it, as you can see from your post. So there.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/27/05
Just got home! I really liked it but overall I think the story is just too difficult to translate to film. The story holes in the musical were more obvious in the movie.
All of the acting was great except for Russell Crowe IMO--I feel like he was too busy trying to sing to really act. Amanda Seyfried wasn't that great IMO until the end, but she did a great job in the last scene. Anne Hathaway was fantastic.
The love story was really difficult for me to sit through, moreso than usual. It just seems so insipid compared to the rest of the story, although I know that we're kind of supposed to think that.
Singing-wise... everyone was pretty good except for Amanda Seyfried, although I actually found her bearable at times. Eddie Redmayne's jaw tension drove me crazy but he sounded good. Russell Crowe was very meh, it wasn't painful for me to hear but I thought his singing lacked emotion. Aaron Tveit and Samantha Barks were the standouts, of course. Colm Wilkinson sounded less "Sean Connery"-ish than usual.
I agree that there were too many close-ups but I thought that there were some great moments in the direction, too. The beginning scene in the shipyards was really well-done, and I liked some of the transitions.
I also liked some of the nods to the novel, like Valjean giving Cosette the doll when he takes her from the Thenardiers.
It definitely beat the Liam Neeson version, though!
Check out my "Before You Go See Les Miz" Summary. It's only 3 minutes. If you agree, please share it.
Moviegoers' Guide to Les Miz
Broadway Star Joined: 11/9/10
So I had a weird and serious question. The scenes before and after "On My Own", there was not a single glimpse or thought of rain, but during it, there was a huge STORM..WTH? Was that just a scattered shower?
There was also rain during "A Little Fall of Rain," naturally, but there didn't seem to be rain at any other point during the barricade. :-/
Broadway Star Joined: 11/9/10
SM2 correct! Just seemed out of place...maybe that is why I felt that it was filmed like a music video to single out the song!
Joey- LOVED your video! LOVED it! Thanks for posting and I will be sharing!
The rain! Yes, it drove me nuts in both instances.
I finally saw Les Miz, though I hesitated because of the length of the film. I really loved Hugh Jackman's acting, along with Anne Hathaway. Eddie Redmayne's voice was surprisingly good. Russell Crowe's singing was not impressive. It would have had more impact had a professional singer taken on the role of Javert. Amanda Seyfried's voice seemed fragile, almost like it was ready to snap at any moment. My favorite singing came from Samatha Barks as Eponine. LOVED her! from RC in Austin,Texas
Sorry, Stagemanager, you are mistaken.
As you can see from my post I last updated it at 10.02 a.m. Your post correcting mine was at 10.52 a.m. What do you think I'm lying? I actually wrote that post, got on the subway, thought about it, realized I had misstated that the American revolution postdated the French Revolution and, embarrassed, corrected it as soon as I got back online.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
When you update your posts, it doesn't update the time as well, inexplicably. For instance, your original post was posted at 10:02am, but the update is also listed as 10:02am, which is not possible 'cause, by your own admission, you took took a subway ride, pondered, realized your mistake, and corrected it when you were able to get back online. All that would've taken a long time. In the meantime, I saw your mistake and corrected it in my reply post, before you were able to go online again. Otherwise, I wouldn't have bothered if you had beaten me to it 'cause I wouldn't have seen it. But I did.
OK, my mistake. I thought I saw that no one had caught my mistake before I corrected it (I was worried someone had, and, congrats, apparently you did!) but I'll take your word for it that you did. In any event....
Apology accepted.
Here's the Nostalgia Chick's review of the film for anyone who's interested:
http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/team-nchick/specials/37785-les-miserables-2012
Here's the video she and her friends did last year about the musical, which she mentions in passing in the review above:
http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/team-nchick/nostalgia-chick/31204-les-miserables-the-musical
WTF! ROFLMAO.
Saw it. Loved it. The film is much closer to the LES MIZ I always saw in my head while listening to the recording--as opposed to the stage show, which I found overly mechanical.
I agree that Seyfried wasn't great, but isn't that the major problem with the show as a whole? That the focal character (not the main or central character but the character with whom the main characters are concerned) is rather insipid and undeveloped?
I love Eponine, but I think it's a major dramaturgical problem in the musical that she takes up the time and music when we should be getting to know and forming an attachment to grown-up Cosette.
The film didn't solve the problem, but it didn't make it any worse.
And FWIW, watching it I finally understood what was being "barricaded". On stage, there just seemed to be a mountain of broken crap for the actors to climb while I was left to wonder why they called it a "barricade" rather than a "pile".
I appreciated that a few replied to my previous questions so I want to sneak just one more in---why do the children sound like Cockneys and Master of the House seemed to be set in a jolly olde english pub-a la Dickens--did they skip across the Chanel at some point?
For the same reason that this takes place in France and everyone has British accents.
Cockney is by no means the only working-class British accent, but it is commonly used to indicate working class characters of other cultures.
Videos