TellZ said: "It is impossible for AI to capture the heartbreak and anger Judy's "Rose's Turn" would have had in spades. Bernadette's stunning acting and vocal choices that would no doubt have informed her Lovett won't be present in a faked recording.
The tech industry's goal to remove artists from art makes me want to hurl."
I disagree with the first sentence quoted, but completely agree with the last.
There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that there will be a time when the technology is sophisticated enough to realistically mimic all the human characteristics (including emotion) that make us human - to a point that unless specifically identified as AI, a human will not know the difference between us and machine. The "last frontier" will be mimicking a believable version of a physical presence in a shared space.
Just as all our technology has evolved to the level we take for granted today, so will AI evolve. A big difference is that AI will teach itself how to accomplish the goal, instead of requiring human intelligence to develop the technology for the machine.
What "makes me want to hurl." is the pace regarding how anxious humans are to adopt and incorporate AI without considering the consequences/impacts of relinquishing our human intelligence and creativity to machines will have on future generations.
In our current generation, we've all but lost any appreciation for human craftsmanship to the manufacturing industry. Likewise, the same will happen re: intelligence and creativity when future generations grow up in the acceptance that AI is "normal", and the tech has advanced itself so far that future humans won't see or appreciate that there is any difference between the two.
Updated On: 1/25/26 at 04:31 PM