The only place in Phantom where Christine is a teenager is in the 2004 film. In the stage musical, she’s supposed to read as being in her early twenties. So, a Christine in her early thirties in LND makes sense.
The Phantom's age is trickier, both because it seems like productions of LND (except for the Danish production, I think) want to play the Phantom and Christine as being the same age, and because in the original musical, there are many, many actors who play the Phantom as being quite up there in age--at the very least, much older than Christine tends to come across. There isn't anything in the text for Phantom that technically says the Phantom is old, but I think it adds more tragedy to his situation to portray him as middle-aged; compared to the young, rich, and dashing Raoul de Chagny, the Phantom is older and ugly and suffering through a terrible hand that has been dealt to him by life.
It's just jarring to go from Phantom, where the titular character is often played by actors who are much older than the leading lady, to Love Never Dies, where the characters in question are presented as being the same age. It's like as Christine gets older, the Phantom gets younger so he'll stay "appealing" to all the young women watching the show. I think it's a missed opportunity, as having the Phantom be old would be a great opportunity to explore the character more; as he gets up there in age, the Phantom wrestles with the tragic fact that his one true love has come and gone, and he spent pretty much his entire long life alone without having accomplished anything or experienced any long-lasting relationships, which would make his discovering he has a son all the more "touching." But oh well.
"Was uns befreit, das muss stärker sein als wir es sind." -Tanz der Vampire
Updated On: 6/16/18 at 02:02 AM