bwayrose7 said: "Brantley's nastiness towards other young-women shows is... really something. Wonder why he left Waitress out of that little tangent? Unsurprised at his review, this didn't seem like his kind of show.
Also find it interestingthat the book is usually blamed for a bad or so-so musical, and in this case it seems to be the one thing that was praised across the board."
Waitress is not a “tween girls” musical. Its about an unplanned pregnancy to annabusive husband, and affair with an OBGYN. Yes its score is pop, and the pie aspect makes the show feel family friendly, but the show is on oasr with Spring Awakening and Rent in terms of content. The only difference is Waitress uses very little profanity. The sex scenes in Bridges of Madison county were more tame. I can understand why parents or school groups would see Spring Awakening or Rent with tween girls as they are both coming of age/historical pieces, Waitress on the other hand is simply a romantic dramady. I like Waitress, by the way, its just very disingenuous to lump it in with the tween targeted musicals of Legally Blonde, Anastasia, frozen, Legally Blonde (which i feel is also underapreciated), Tuck Everlasting, Bring it On and now Mean Girls. Waitress should be catagorized with more adult modern musicals like Bridges of Madison County, Bright Star, Lysistratta Jones, and Once.