2) You could EASILY see what was happening in the N2N performance, any half-witted person could understand. If you did not get the "back story" from the introduction of BE, you would have NO clue what was going on. Billy Elliot is, of course a great show, but that performance was AWFUL and AWKWARD and thank god they dont need help selling tickets bc that would not have helped them AT ALL.
N2N is original, and though provoking and just an amazing piece of intelligent theatre, not just a carbon copy of an "ok" movie. I don't understand why you first say any "half-witted person" could get N2N and then go on to say that N2N is "though provoking [sic] and just an amazing piece of intelligent theatre". maybe it's just me, but isn't that a contradiction?
I think you can do a little reading, a little basic research, to try and understand the back story of Billy Elliot. I don't think it's a perfect piece of theatre at all, but I love that it takes place during such a specific social movement, however removed it may feel. imagine, like, this story happening in Detroit with auto factory workers.
oh, and the movie is more than "ok". the movie is superior to the musical, in my opinion.
anyway, I do agree that Angry Dance was a poor choice. I stand by my conviction that Solidarity is one of the most perfectly staged numbers I've ever seen in a musical. they should've done that.
When I see the phrase "the ____ estate", I imagine a vast mansion in the country full of monocled men and high-collared women receiving letters about productions across the country and doing spit-takes at whatever they contain.
-Kad
Updated On: 6/8/09 at 01:21 AM