tracker
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
Home For You Chat My Shows (beta) Register/Login Games Grosses
pixeltracker

No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY

No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY

Auggie27 Profile Photo
Auggie27
#1No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 10:05am

It's not on the outrage charts like the collective Chenowethian gasps, but was anyone else startled to see Jonathon Tunick take two orchestration slots, shutting out M-M Campbell? I remain loyal to the original arrangements (Mr. Tunick's, curiously), but think she did a masterful job of re-conceiving the sound of the show. The 110 orchestrations did not strike me as a radical departure from the Hershey Kay orignals.


"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 5/15/07 at 10:05 AM

Sleeper2 Profile Photo
Sleeper2
#2re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 10:07am

Dude, her name is Mary-Mitchell Campbell.

It's a Tony meltdown that she wasn't nominated.

sweetestsiren Profile Photo
sweetestsiren
#2re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 10:10am

I really think she deserved a nomination, but I'm not really surprised since people have been divided on the reduced Company orchestrations all season.

Auggie27 Profile Photo
Auggie27
#3re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 10:11am

Whoops. Thanks, I dood it over, dude.


"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling

luvtheEmcee Profile Photo
luvtheEmcee
#4re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 10:47am

This pisses me off. A lot. She deserved one. Her work for the show is fantastic; the orchestrations are just beautiful.

In other news, with only three nominations, that show is... well, totally ****ed.


A work of art is an invitation to love.

munkustrap178 Profile Photo
munkustrap178
#5re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 10:52am

I don't know - to be honest, I don't love COMPANY's new orchestrations they way I loved SWEENEY's. They're just okay for me.


"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

BroadwayGirl107 Profile Photo
BroadwayGirl107
#6re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 11:10am

I loved these orchestrations even more than Sweeney's. I actually prefer them to the original ones.


It's a shame...I think this show really got the short end with the nominations. It deserved a lot better, and I'm worried about how much longer it will be open.

#7re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 11:17am

I thought the orchestrations for COMPANY sounded very thin. Different? Yes. Unusual? Yes. Good? No.

C is for Company
#8re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 11:21am

I'm with Munk. It is always commendable to see someone completely put new effort into an older score, although I don't really think they were too fantastic. It worked with the concept of the show, more like as an experience, but ultimately left me unfulfilled. I think Sweeney's were better overall, even if these "worked" more for the show.


Weez Profile Photo
Weez
#9re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:06pm

Call me a fangirl, but I would've nominated her for 'You Could Drive A Person Crazy' alone. Ah well. Despite a mere three nominations, I will still fly the Team Company flag come June 10th. Goddammit but these were disappointing nominations from a 'Company' fangirl perspective. re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY


luvtheEmcee Profile Photo
luvtheEmcee
#10re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:13pm

I'll wave it with you. re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY


A work of art is an invitation to love.

robbiej Profile Photo
robbiej
#11re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:15pm

I don't think the orchestrations sounded as 'altered' as SWEENEY's. Also, I think the playing of the cast was less polished than SWEENEY's company. They may have been great orchestrations, but were marred by playing that wasn't completely clean...so who can really tell?

That said, I really was terrifically surprised by how much I liked COMPANY (didn't love SWEENEY). I thought it just worked better as a whole. And the last 20 minutes, including Walsh's spectacular LADIES WHO LUNCH through to the end, were some of the best I've experienced this season.

Esparza was pretty terrific in a cypher of a role. But I do think it's a shame that Walsh's wonderful turn was overlooked. Especially since I think one of the reasons Esparza was so good was because of the work she did with him in that final scene of theirs.


"I'm so looking forward to a time when all the Reagan Democrats are dead."

keen on kean Profile Photo
keen on kean
#12re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:17pm

Go, teamCompany! Flags across the city!

luvtheEmcee Profile Photo
luvtheEmcee
#13re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:22pm

There's an image.

I've always been proud to support this show. Today doesn't change that. re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY


A work of art is an invitation to love.

keen on kean Profile Photo
keen on kean
#14re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:25pm

Em - you are right. I was annoyed by the low number of nominations, but I still think this show is sadly overlooked. I love it. Guess I better stock up on tickets while I can.

raphael06 Profile Photo
raphael06
#15re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/15/07 at 12:30pm

"I loved these orchestrations even more than Sweeney's. I actually prefer them to the original ones."

Here here!


"I chose and my world was shaken. So what? The choice may have been mistaken. The choosing was not."-Sunday in the Park with George

The Boy From Ohio Profile Photo
The Boy From Ohio
#16re: No Mary Campbell Mitchell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/16/07 at 12:59pm

I was a little disappointed to learn she was not nominated. I thought they were beautiful and took the show out of the 70's. Plus it matched the staging perfectly. I thought she had a good shot at winning.


9/10 - Next To Normal, Ensemble Theatre
9/18 - Brian Stokes Mitchell, Cincy Pop's
9/28 - Death Of A Salesman, Wright State

Sleeper2 Profile Photo
Sleeper2
#17re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 7:09pm

MMC is a total sweetheart. Besides being one of the few women musical directors on Broadway and teaching at Julliard, she finds time to run a non-profit: Artists Striving to End Poverty (ASTEP).

The fact her creativity wasn't recognized by the Tony nominators for Company will be a small footnote in the long career she has ahead of her. It is still insane, IMHO.
A STEP's website

luvtheEmcee Profile Photo
luvtheEmcee
#18re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 7:12pm

Agreed! And additionally, congrats to her on the Drama Desk!


A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 5/28/07 at 07:12 PM

ben1986 Profile Photo
ben1986
#19re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 9:27pm

I have to agree with even who says that she deserved the Tony nom. Out of all of the musicals this season, both new and revival, I was the most impressed by Company.

jv92 Profile Photo
jv92
#20re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 9:30pm

I think they're so-so orchestrations. She deserved a nod over Tunick's orchestral reduction of 110 in the Shade (He's brilliant, but his work was medicore on that.) or Spring Awakening. I loved Sweeney Todd's new orchestrations though. However, Tunick's work on Company was so superb, it's hard not to wish you were hearing the original when you're hearing something that isn't.

desiree armfeldt Profile Photo
desiree armfeldt
#21re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 9:37pm

I was actually very upset.

wickedfan Profile Photo
wickedfan
#22re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 9:49pm

I'm one of the few who prefers Doyle's Company to his Sweeney. I think that the reduced orchestrations worked for both, but I really loved how it was done with Company. The instruments actually played a part in the production this time, as opposed to Sweeney. I would've preferred Company get a Best Orchestrations nomination over Spring Awakening.


"Sing the words, Patti!!!!" Stephen Sondheim to Patti LuPone.

CurtainPullDowner Profile Photo
CurtainPullDowner
#23re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 10:53pm

I loved her work on SWEENEY, not at all on COMPANY.
It sounded weak on such a great score and it didn't help that the so called actors/musicians were very sloppy in playing it.
She is a wonderful artist and will do very well without the nom this year.

wonderfulwizard11 Profile Photo
wonderfulwizard11
#24re: No Mary Mitchell Campbell nom for COMPANY
Posted: 5/28/07 at 10:56pm

Curtain- Campbell didn't win for SWEENEY TODD, that was Sarah Travis.


I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.


Videos