Posted: 6/27/19 at 10:14am
Why is Hillary and Clinton coming up? The intent in that play is not to have actors who look and sound like the Clintons; it's not meant as a vehicle for a transformative impression of a famous person, like this play is.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 10:21am
I saw a production of this starring Mulgrew's understudy, Paula Ewin. She used the original set on some kind of abbreviated tour. The charm and interest of the piece was that you felt your were in Hepburn's living room, sharing an afternoon with her as she spoke to you about her life. This only works if the actor is convincing enough at replicating Hepburn for you to suspend disbelief and go with the premise that you are having tea with Hepburn. Ewin pulled it off beautifully. But it was complete with voice and mannerisms.
This is not a play with a dramatic arc that grips you and brings you along. It's a chat with a star. And you need to be able to see the star to make it interesting. The star being Hepburn, not Dunaway.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 10:23am
Kad said: "Why is Hillary and Clinton coming up? The intent in that play is not to have actors who look and sound like the Clintons; it's not meant as a vehicle for a transformative impression of a famous person, like this play is."
I think the reason its coming up is because Dunaway seems to be treating the piece like the actors did in Hillary and Clinton. Like you said theres a major difference for this play however and it doesn't seem her performance is working at all.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 10:29am
Since neither the director nor the star have commented, we don't have any idea what the approach is here. It's a major presumption to say that the performance style of Hilary and Clinton has had any influence on what Dunaway is doing on that stage. For all we know she's simply trying to master her lines and will layer in some kind of attempt at characterizing Hepburn once she does.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 11:11am
Posted: 6/27/19 at 11:28am
Jordan, since you've seen the show, do you think this might be a situation of everyone just making the best of what perhaps isn't an ideal situation. I.E. - Just get her through this run to save face? Does she have any even small moments of brilliance?
Posted: 6/27/19 at 11:35am
Posted: 6/27/19 at 12:14pm
Also, Lombardo has stated Dunaway reached out to him to do this so he deconstructed the original 2 act play to one act just for her. Revisiting TEA FOR FIVE for Dunaway was never on his radar at any time until she reached out to him.
And yes, he has said she arrived to meet with him in full older Hepburn costume: hair, red sweater around shoulders, slacks, etc and did a spot-on older Hepburn voice to perfection. So basically, he was commissioned for this vanity project by Dunaway.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 1:14pm
I don't think it is clear that this is Dunaway's vanity project (as opposed to Lombardo's).
I also don't think it is fair to judge her for what she was, or what she became. I believe in redemption. 
That said, I have suspected from the announcement of this that it was a train wreck looking for a crossing. Now we know where and why. Don't bother calling the NTSB.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 1:15pm
Hope it makes it to New York. Saw Faye D in "Master Class." Her performance was mesmerizing from the moment she walked out on stage.
Posted: 6/27/19 at 7:29pm
It so confusing BrodyFosse123 because Lombardo stated in a recent interview:
The original Tea at Five premiered at Hartford Stage and was two acts: Hepburn at 31 and, after intermission, 76. “It was interesting to show two different phases of her life, but I realized the audiences responded far more to Act II. So I thought, why don’t we do a 90-minute version where she reflects on her career? It’s more concise. You know, I’ve been working on it for 18 years, so I hope I got it right this time!”
Lombardo wrote the role specifically for Faye Dunaway. “I sent it to her by messenger Monday evening, and I woke up Tuesday to a beautiful message from Faye saying she loved the play, how moved she was and how much she wanted to do it.”
In that interview he makes it sound like changing it to a one act play focusing on the later Hepburn was not a request from Faye but something he did on his own with Faye already in his mind to do it.
I'M SO CONFUSED!!!!
http://bostonguide.com/article-78710-boston-accent:-second-act.html
Posted: 6/27/19 at 7:43pm
@logan2, I think BrodyFosse123 jumped to a conclusion but otherwise what they said is not inconsistent with what you read: (1) he (re)wrote it with her in mind, (2) he sent it to her, (3) she responded to it enthusiastically, (4) she showed up to meet with him in full conveyance of her enthusiasm.
Posted: 6/28/19 at 2:40pm
Posted: 6/28/19 at 7:53pm
Posted: 6/28/19 at 7:58pm
Posted: 6/28/19 at 8:24pm
In these photos of her in previews, she looks more like Mary Tyler Moore in 'Ordinary People' and less like the great Hepburn in anything at all.
https://www.broadwayworld.com/article/Photo-Flash-Get-A-First-Look-At-Faye-Dunaway-As-Katharine-Hepburn-In-TEA-AT-FIVE-20190624
Posted: 6/28/19 at 8:31pm
OrlandoTheatreLover said: "I flew from Orlando to see the great Dunaway (or at least I thought) in this Tuesday. I was so looking forward to a great night of Theatre, but that was NOT the case. I think 78yo Dunaway should retire as she stumbled over the lines the entire play. It was painful to watch and not just the part during curtain call when she lost her balance and fell over. Also the autograph sellers that never go to the show and take all of her time away from the real people who came to the show are really annoying and rude. Everything about this was a train wreck. I wish I had something nice to say about it. Well, here goes, it was nice that it was over. There. I wish I had liked it. Just like I wish Dunaway cared enough after 50+ years to know the difference between a fan and these asses that use her for profit. Lesson learned here at least."
I think you need a nap.
Posted: 6/28/19 at 8:55pm
eating this up...i could read folks reviews of this all day long. fascinating. couldn't care less about fans waiting for autographs but love hearing about the show...damn she still hasn't learned her lines ON TOP OF the fact that Faye is making some deliberate choices on HOW she portrays Katherine Hepburn. Wow.
assuming if critics are seeing it tonight theres a good chance Boston Globe would post tomorrow? Wonder if any NY critics are planning on review?
Posted: 6/28/19 at 9:09pm
Posted: 6/28/19 at 10:58pm
Before this thread reaches the fifth page can someone, ANYONE, give us an update on the things that really matter? What is the show curtain, merch, and stage door like for this show?
Asking because I'm a SERIOUS theater aficionado.
Posted: 6/28/19 at 11:02pm
Posted: 6/29/19 at 9:30am
reviews still haven't posted, yet
my guess is that they invited critics to last night/s performance so critics are still filling their reviews??
Posted: 6/29/19 at 2:34pm
wonderwaiter said: "Before this thread reaches the fifth page can someone, ANYONE, give us an update on the things that really matter? What is the show curtain, merch, and stage door like for this show?
Asking because I'm a SERIOUS theater aficionado."
I was unironically going to ask the last question because my mother has been a fan of Ms Dunaway since Bonnie and Clyde. 
Posted: 6/29/19 at 3:10pm
Saw this review just posted: https://www.theatretalkboston.com/post/review-tea-at-five-huntington-avenue-theatre-pre-broadway-engagement
Posted: 6/30/19 at 12:11am
nealb1 said: "Hope it makes it to New York. Saw Faye D in "Master Class." Her performance was mesmerizing from the moment she walked out on stage."
Callas is in her wheelhouse. Im not surprised she was marvelous. Hepburn is not. This is why I wish she was given a new role in a new play or at least something in line with her talent. Mimicking Kate Hepburn is a terrible idea for her. Didnt she do Master Class over 20 years ago?
