Rant about the 2013 TONY nominations here — Page 8
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:11am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:12am
Nuh-uuuh! As a "classic", that has no book at all, there would be no category for it...
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:14am
I still contend that Young Actors should not be allowed eligibility at all. They should have their own "floating" category (optional from year to year) for an honorary Tony citation. Pitting Young Actors against adults is unfair to both sides.
But you're dealing with two separate issues here. The Matildas were most likely deemed ineligible not because they're children, but because they're each only giving two performances a week. I do agree that it's unfair to have young actors pitted against adults, and perhaps a floating category could be a solution. I think it's still different to have a young actor giving six or eight performances a week nominated against adults with the same schedule, as opposed to grouping together four young actors who each go on twice a week and having them compete with adults going on 6-8 times a week.
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:14am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:17am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:20am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:20am
"I am sorry but it is an unjust world and virtue is only triumphant in theatricle performances" The Mikado
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:22am
I wrote a lengthier description in another thread, with more details, including why that situation would be acceptable when restricted to Young Actors (as they're defined by NY law and Actors' Equity), but it's just my own, little pipe-dream, so not worth searching out...
...Brilliant as it was...
.
.
.
Updated On: 4/30/13 at 10:22 AM
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:22am
Also, while I am surprised at Lilla’s shut out, I don’t think that just because the Matildas got a special honor means that another child performer should automatically get nominated, just because that actor is performing more shows a week. The nomination committee must have found that they felt each of the Matildas performances were excellent enough to deserve recognition (but, deemed that two shows a week could not justify a Leading Actress nomination) and that Lilla’s performance did not deem recognition. It has nothing to do with the amount of work the actresses are doing, but rather the quality of the work they are doing. (Which, clearly the nominating committee found the Matildas quality of work to be more excellent than Lilla’s.) Also, just a note, I have seen neither so I have no opinion at this point on whether or not Lilla or the Matildas should have been recognized, I am just making the point that the judgment of whether or not actors get recognized for these awards is not based off of how hard they working, but rather how good the performance they are giving is.
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:24am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:27am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:28am
Shalita Grant is the most wonderful surprise nomination! I assumed Nielsen was going to be nommed in Supporting and handily win it. Now, it's open season. I'm assuming Tyson will win as a career honor (and for a really lovely performance), but she has incredibly stiff competition from every other actress in that category.
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:37am
I think it would fun to have Nielsen host the Tonys as Maggie Smith. Her lines about being nominated tonight should inspire some louder than usual laughter.
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:40am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:42am
I'm flying partially blind in my response because I can't prove anyone's motivations for going the "multi-casting" route, but I feel like it's worth considering that multi-casting Young Actors in roles may be a solution for issues that the young Daisy Egan might have unnecessarily been put through, due to the "adult" demands of performing a large role.
Adult actors don't also have the demands of being required (by NY law) to succeed in their schoolwork or lose their job. Not to mention the importance of getting a good night's sleep, etc... Adults have their issues to contend with, too, but -- they're adults.
Updated On: 4/30/13 at 10:42 AM
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:45am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 10:56am
I hoped that HANDS ON A HARDBODY would've taken one of the slots filled by BRING IT ON or A CHRISTMAS STORY, but the category is a duel to the death between MATILDA and KINKY BOOTS
For Best Play:
Sounds about on-par. I think VANYA will take it as MARY and LUCKY GUY both had critics quibbling and ASSEMBLED PARTIES seems to be the only formidable competitor. I hoped THE OTHER PLACE would've made its way into the shuffle.
For Best Musical Revival:
It's a showdown between PIPPIN and DROOD, with PIPPIN having the edge. CINDERELLA is a possible spoiler.
For Best Play Revival:
No complaints, except that HARVEY should've taken ORPHANS' slot. That was purely a matter of timing.
For Best Actor in a Musical:
I'm surprised at Santino Fontana and Stark Sands picking up nods, as I sooner would've put Jim Norton and Anthony Warlow in their places. But again, it really doesn't matter as this category is a duel to the death between Billy Porter and Bertie Carvel.
For Best Actress in a Musical:
Sounds on-par. I'm thrilled for Stephanie J. Block, especially earning a nomination for a role Betty Buckley played way back when and wasn't recognized for it. God Bless Carolee, she deserves this after slogging through that piece-of-shlt SCANDALOUS.
For Best Actor in a Play:
The playing field seems pretty level across the board. With the exception of (maybe) Tom Hanks, a strong argument can be made for any nominee. Alan Cumming could've easily taken Hanks' spot, and his snub is very glaring.
For Best Actress in a Play:
Despite people's shock at Bette Midler's snub, although the reviewers did praise her, it's essentially Bette playing a Bette Midler role (not much to delve into). People have said that Holland Taylor should be shuffled out in favor of Bette, but Holland Taylor workshopped for years to create that character and it was nothing less than a reincarnation of Ann Richards herself. I'm thrilled for Laurie Metcalf to get a nomination. Also, could Kristine Nielsen possibly pull a James Corden this year?
For Best Featured Actor in a Musical:
I hoped that Andy Karl would've been able to sneak in, but I'll take Will Chase. I also love that Carradine scored a nomination, as he was wonderful in HARDBODY.
For Best Featured Actress in a Musical:
I would've preferred Jessie Mueller or Lesli Margherita (the flashiest of the female roles - Trunchbull excluded - in Matilda) over Victoria Clark, but it seems to be Andrea Martin's to lose. I have my fingers crossed for Keala Settle though.
For Best Featured Actor in a Play:
The only nominee I saw was Billy Magnussen and I'm a bit surprised he picked up a nomination, but happy nevertheless. Richard Kind was also an easy call based on the glowing reviews he got for THE BIG KNIFE. He could be a spoiler for Magnussen or Shalhoub
For Best Featured Actress in a Play:
Seems about on par, but I'm shocked and also beyond thrilled that Shalita Grant picked up a nomination.
Updated On: 4/30/13 at 10:56 AM
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:00am
Ken Davenports blog entry for today reeks of annoyance and disappointment.
My Show Didn't Get Any Nominations, Here Is A Distraction
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:01am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:10am
But we would probably have to create a Tony for Best Featured Abs in a Play:
-Cheyenne Jackson, THE PERFORMERS
-Seth Numrich, GOLDEN BOY
-Billy Magnussen, VANYA AND SONIA AND MASHA AND SPIKE
-Sebastian Stan, PICNIC
-Jonny Orsini, THE NANCE
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:20am
Updated On: 4/30/13 at 11:20 AM
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:33am
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:44am
One complaint is the best musical category. Bring It On AND A Christmas Story? REALLY? No Motown? No Hands on a Hardbody? No Chaplin? I can't believe it!
But I'm very pleased with the choices for Best Actor/Actress/Featured Actor/Featured Actress in a musical!
Posted: 4/30/13 at 11:56am
Surprised, but not disappointed, by Santino's nomination.
I can't stop laughing about Kenneth Posner's nominations.
If Danny Troob doesn't win for Cinderella orchestrations, I will be very upset. He breathed new life into one of the most recognizable Broadway scores ever and really added a more atmospheric quality that the previous scores, which tended to favor a more traditional orchestration, lacked. Of all the categories this is the one I'm most invested in this year.
William Ivey Long deserves that costume Tony. Not only were the actual costumes beautiful, but the costume transitions are worthy of their own special Tony.
Disappointed that Anna Louizos was nominated for Drood, not Cinderella, for sets. I don't think she should win for Cinderella, but I was hoping for a nomination: it would have been easy to go way over-the-top with the scenery, and she kept it simple, which worked really well for this production.
Rachel Bay Jones was definitely snubbed for Pippin. Catherine has to be funny, charming, sweet, strong, and conflicted for the role to really work; she has relatively complex motivations given her time onstage and, as much as I will always love Thea Voula, Jones really stood out for me in a role that doesn't always lend itself to being remembered. You could see why Pippin thought giving up glory would be worth it for a life with her and Theo.
BroadwayWorld TV