Scarlet Leigh said: "Was not a fan then still not a fan now. It has it's moments and it's performances but overall Travolta and that accent are horribly miscast, the heck was Amanda Bynes doing half the time (not to mention who was the dumb costumer that puts someone in a skin tight dress that doesn't allow a person to move during the biggest dance number of the whole movie?), Tracy was suppose to be some kind of outstanding dancer that her size did not matter cus she was just so good and Blonsky was an okay dancer at best, and the changed ending is just plan nonsensical even for a musical. There is NO WAY that in 5 minutes more people called in to cast votes than the total amount of folks that had been calling in casting votes for weeks and weeks. It was a change thrown in to make it look ultra progressive but I couldn't get over how unneeded a change it was." (Emphasis added.)
You are absolutely right about the lack of verisimilitude, but is that any more unlikely than the River City Boy's Band actually playing the Minuet in G? Than Tommy returning to Scotland and breaking all the rules of the "Miracle" set up during the show, yet succeeding because, well, love? That every relationship in the show is suddenly solves by the humiliation and devastation of Horace Vandergelder, the famous, Unmarried half-a-milliionaire?
My point is just that musical comedies--even going back as far as Plautus--are not known primarily for their realistic plausibility.
Myself, I found it rather it rather brave, and actually MORE believable in a non-literal sense, that Little Inez won the contest. It takes a lot of guts to deny the audience the resolution we've been conditioned to expect over the past 2,000 years, that the heroine will get the wish she articulates at the top of the show.
Perhaps it could have been accomplished with a little more elegance, but the basic idea contained a lot of truth.