Undergraduate students are NOT the only "poor" people who benefitted from lotteries. On the average, graduate students are actually poorer than undergrads (who tend to have their parents' support). These rush policies infuriate me as a graduate student. I've got far less money than I did as an undergrad, yet many places (like Tarzan) think I should be paying full price. - Starletta (I think... too lazy to switch back)
Yes, I agree that grad students can be just as broke/broker than undergrads. I'm a senior undergrad now and am starting grad school in the fall where my "international student" status will prohibit me from working as much as I currently do. What I think they *should* do is to follow the Second Stage Theatre policy - rather than Student Rush, make it Youth Rush. In this way, the "target audience" of (primarily students) under 25 can buy affordable tix but then there's no loss for kids who can't go to college for various reasons/recent grads drowning in debt/etc. Making sure that someone doesn't do rush more than once or twice a month can also spread the wealth.
But I have no sympathy whatsoever to people who would go to the Tarzan lottery multiple times complaining about the student status - if you can afford to see the show in lotto seats 4 times, then you can buy a full price ticket once. I think it's more unfair for people like that to, in a sense, "deprive" students or others from seeing shows... why not let everyone have a shot.
Whatever, I have no intention of seeing Tarzan because there are so many better shows out there, but I find it amusing that you all are so up in arms about this whereas if you were an undergrad I doubt you'd be upset.
i grew up 13 miles north of bohemia and 31 miles northeast of hicksville.