The REAL Reason Barbour Left ROCKY HORROR — Page 3
Posted: 8/19/11 at 12:32pm
Also, rape victims settle for money all of the time. It doesn't minimize what happened to them.
Updated On: 8/19/11 at 12:32 PM
Posted: 8/19/11 at 12:37pm
So, wait - even though he took a plea, is not a felon and doesn't have to reigster as a sex offender, HE got the short end of the stick. Really?
As for the fame-whore girl, I haven't even seen her name printed in ONE article yet. Can someone point me in the direction of all this profiteering she is alleged to be doing? I'll believe everyone who says how horrible she is - I just want to see just a wee bit of proof.
Trust me, no one thought she was anything less than 20.
I guess if I were to get caught with someone who turned out to be 15 and I really didn't know they were 15, then I wouldn't admit that I knew they were 15. Are you saying that he was lying about knowing her real age? Why would he do that?
Another old thread (lots of victim blaming here, too)
Updated On: 8/19/11 at 12:37 PM
Posted: 8/19/11 at 2:34pm
How did she profit from this?
Her name and face were never used.
Someone said they don't blame her, then said what she did was disgusting. What did she do? Turn in a preditor? Did she get jobs because she's that kid Barbour did?
And from what I have heard, this was not an "isolated" incident.
And Barbour may have apoligised for the public, but he still maintains that he was set up (3 times) and has convinced many of his story.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 3:14pm
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:05pm
What are the other examples of these laws? And what's your implication - that the law is designed to give actors the shaft?
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:10pm
The actress in question has worked steadily in theatre and television since 2006--the year she first brought charges against Barbour. And here in New York--in the theatre world--it's well-known who she is, even if it never made many of the papers.
Updated On: 8/19/11 at 04:10 PM
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:21pm
I ask these questions not to be an a-hole, but because I find the sentiments being expressed about the girl - who was 15 years old when she blew James Barbour, who was then 35 - really astound me.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:28pm
She has the right to pursue a career in any industry she chooses. And so does he.
Updated On: 8/19/11 at 04:28 PM
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:31pm
Oh, from what you've heard. So, beyond his plea bargain and what he admitted to and served the time he was asked to serve, you are now convicting him of other incidents that you've "heard" he committed. It's fine to have an opinion on the FACTS as they are known, but it is not fine to hurl allegations for which you a) have no proof, b) "heard" from someone (please), and c) have no personal knowledge of. Really, don't expect anyone anywhere to take anything you have to say on this matter seriously because what you're doing here is more than a little specious. It's fine to think he's a scum for the one incident he was charged with - that is your right and you can certainly spout off about it as much as you like (and you have) - but leave gossip and rumor out of it.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:35pm
And I still don't get announcing "I was molested by a Broadway star" as a career launching pad.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:41pm
Perhaps this should be applied to the girl, as well as to James Barbour.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:51pm
And read this whole thread, I am not the only one who has heard there were other girls.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 4:53pm
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:07pm
It's not all that far-fetched, guys.
Heck, I got famous when Kevin Spacey bought me a drink.
Excuse me.
"Bought me a drink."
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:09pm
First, the serving of a criminal sentence does not constitute any kind of rehabilitation. It's just serving time. Rehabilitation is something else entirely, and probably seldom accomplished with this type of crime.
Crimes of both rape and child molestation are noted for their high recidivist (repeat offender) rates.
Let's take a look at some facts. Excerpts from a NY Times article regarding Barbour's criminal act in question:
"Mr. Barbour’s lawyer...said his client accepted the deal because if a jury had convicted him of the original felony sex charges against him he would have been forced to register as a sex offender, “which basically would have ended his career.”
His lawyer said that the prosecutor’s agreement to a misdemeanor plea showed the weaknesses of its case. But Mr. Barbour had to agree to a lengthy series of conditions of probation that are very similar to those that apply to convicted sex offenders.
While he is on probation, he must inform the manager, producer or assistant director of any theatrical, film or television project he works in that he has been convicted of endangering the welfare of a child, “having engaged in oral sexual conduct and sexual contact with a 15-year-old child.”
And he has to get permission from the court or his probation officer to participate in shows employing child actors or to give backstage tours to children.
He must also attend sex-offender treatment and cannot visit playgrounds, arcades, amusement parks, school grounds or Internet chat rooms frequented by children without permission from his probation officer.
In a signed statement to the police in April 2006, Mr. Barbour said that he was just acting as a mentor to the girl, that he had done no more than touch her knees and kiss her and that he thought that she was 16.
But in court on Thursday when asked by Justice Scherer, “Were you aware of her exact age?” Mr. Barbour replied, “Yes.”
“What was that age?” Justice Scherer pressed.
“Fifteen,” he replied.
At least one Broadway veteran said on Thursday that Mr. Barbour, who played the Beast in “Beauty and the Beast” for about one year, might find himself less marketable for family-friendly shows for awhile.""
NY Times re Barbour Guilty Plea
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:15pm
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:21pm
And you lose any credibility you might have had with me (which, I'll say, is very little considering some other posts you've made) before you even start.
First, the serving of a criminal sentence does not constitute any kind of rehabilitation. It's just serving time. Rehabilitation is something else entirely, and probably seldom accomplished with this type of crime.
It would take very little effort to find that the terms of Barbour's probation required him to attend an outpatient sex-offender treatment program in addition to serving jail time disclosing his status as a sex-offender to employers and colleagues.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:25pm
The lawyer was a jackass to suggest that and aside from the penalties of violating the law, would probably opened himself up to ethics charges and potential disbarment and he knew it, so he was just shouting for theatrics, which obviously the court didn't fall for.
Since he chose NOT to go to trial and ADMITTED he knew her age and thus that he LIED in a SIGNED STATEMENT to police, his credibility is shot and no one has any right to complain about the child victim. If he was innocent, he could have chosen to prove it at trial. BARBOUR made the CHOICE to admit GUILT.
His name is MUD and he knows it. He's lucky he got someone to marry him. He's lucky when he finds work. He is no oppressed victim; he was a sexual predator to a child.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:25pm
And why the silence from his fellow cast members? Is it a question of speak up and you'll never work here again? The Old Globe looks pitiful.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:25pm
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:27pm
And why the silence from his fellow cast members? Is it a question of speak up and you'll never work here again?
They are probably the victims of the same cabal who got [REDACTED] her first understudy gig on Broadway.
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:30pm
Are you paid to do it?
Are you a misogynist who hates women and doesn't care about female victims?
If Barbour admitted his own guilt, why don't you? Do you think the lives and safety of children is worthless and of no interest to you? That's pretty sick.
Why should I care what you think of me when you are defending an admitted criminal?
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:33pm
Updated On: 8/19/11 at 05:33 PM
Posted: 8/19/11 at 5:34pm
2. No. As I've posted clearly on this thread, I find what Barbour did wrong and misguided, but I also believe he has served his time and that's where it ends for me.
3. I have nothing to admit or be guilty of. My opinions are my opinions.
4. You can think of me whatever you wish.
Posts like that are why almost no one on this board take you seriously. Maybe you'll have another meltdown here. Those are always entertaining.
Updated On: 8/19/11 at 05:34 PM
BroadwayWorld TV