Lot of nonsense in this thread. If anyone posting in this thread is being paid by Barbour to protect his interests they had better disclose it.
First, the serving of a criminal sentence does not constitute any kind of rehabilitation. It's just serving time. Rehabilitation is something else entirely, and probably seldom accomplished with this type of crime.
Crimes of both rape and child molestation are noted for their high recidivist (repeat offender) rates.
Let's take a look at some facts. Excerpts from a NY Times article regarding Barbour's criminal act in question:
"Mr. Barbour’s lawyer...said his client accepted the deal because if a jury had convicted him of the original felony sex charges against him he would have been forced to register as a sex offender, “which basically would have ended his career.”
His lawyer said that the prosecutor’s agreement to a misdemeanor plea showed the weaknesses of its case. But Mr. Barbour had to agree to a lengthy series of conditions of probation that are very similar to those that apply to convicted sex offenders.
While he is on probation, he must inform the manager, producer or assistant director of any theatrical, film or television project he works in that he has been convicted of endangering the welfare of a child, “having engaged in oral sexual conduct and sexual contact with a 15-year-old child.”
And he has to get permission from the court or his probation officer to participate in shows employing child actors or to give backstage tours to children.
He must also attend sex-offender treatment and cannot visit playgrounds, arcades, amusement parks, school grounds or Internet chat rooms frequented by children without permission from his probation officer.
In a signed statement to the police in April 2006, Mr. Barbour said that he was just acting as a mentor to the girl, that he had done no more than touch her knees and kiss her and that he thought that she was 16.
But in court on Thursday when asked by Justice Scherer, “Were you aware of her exact age?” Mr. Barbour replied, “Yes.”
“What was that age?” Justice Scherer pressed.
“Fifteen,” he replied.
At least one Broadway veteran said on Thursday that Mr. Barbour, who played the Beast in “Beauty and the Beast” for about one year, might find himself less marketable for family-friendly shows for awhile.""
NY Times re Barbour Guilty Plea