Fetus said: "Impossible2 said: "Fetus said: "joevitus said: "There'sno evidence Ramasar is a predator, so I can't be defending one. Finley is a predator, that's clear. And I haven't defended him.There is no evidence Ramasar has preyed on anyone. None of the court documents demonstrate that he has."
Nobody has described Ramasar as a "predator", but he was found guilty of sexual misconduct by New York City Ballet. While they did not have grounds to fire him, they made sure to note that he was ordered to undergo counseling on a condition of his reinstatement.
https://www.dancemagazine.com/zachary-catazaro-amar-ramasar-firing-determined-wrongful-2635059461.html?rebelltitem=5#rebelltitem5
"The arbitration brought on by the American Guild of Musical Artists, which challenged New York City Ballet's suspension and termination of Zachary Catazaro and Amar Ramasar, has concluded. The arbitrator has ruled that while NYCB was justified in disciplining the two men, suspension was the appropriate punishment for their actions and termination was too severe. As such, the arbitrator has ordered NYCB to reinstate Catazaro and Ramasar to their former positions as Principal Dancers with NYCB.
NYCB is gratified that the arbitrator upheld the Company's right to discipline the men for their actions but still believes strongly that it was also within its rights to terminate Catazaro and Ramasar. However, the Company is bound by the arbitrator's decision and will abide by the ruling. Catazaro intends to resign from the Company, effective immediately, and NYCB supports that decision. Ramasar does plan to return to NYCB and as a condition of his reinstatement, the arbitrator has ordered that he undergo counseling on the standards for his conduct."
In my opinion, and the opinion of many others, it is too soon for him to return to Broadway in a principal role when he still facing repercussions (and supposedly undergoing counseling)from his behavior at NYCB. Putting him into another breeding ground of young performers sends the wrong message here, in a revival that has an otherwise very exciting/inspired cast and creative team."
Sohe's been disciplined (and rightly so) andsuffered the consequences of his actions in a work capacity and been shamed (and rightly so) across the entire world for hisactions. Every person he will ever know in the future especially at work, will know what he did and that he isn't worth dealing with on a personal level.
Case closed."
I bolded my point since you didn't seem to read what I said and jumped to conclusions. You can disagree, but you are clearly in the minority of people upset that are aware of this situation.
Ramasar is in the middle of an ongoing lawsuit on this matter, so not only is he a liability to this production, but he's still awaiting potentially more repercussions for his actions. The case isn't"closed"."
Look, I don't want to argue with you, you seem like a nice person.
I do not disagree with ANYTHING you are saying. The man is a pig and treated women appallingly and frankly the decision to cast someone in his situation is simply mind boggling. However the fact he has been hired under such controversial circumstances says to me that the people who made that decision know a hell of a lot more about the situation than any of us do. I highly doubt they have hired someone and are going to rehearse this person for however long only to have to drop him if he is charged with a crime. It just doesn't make sense. There is obviously more to it than what we already know.