I've seen some of the best behaved audiences in the last 18 months or so, and can't quite find the common denominator that might tease out these productions they were attending, other than a certain intellectual profile in the content of the productions, but not exclusively: John Proctor, Liberation, Oedipus, and - wait for it - Bat Boy, oddly enough (but I've found the City Center audiences consistently well-behaved). I was also with an out-of-town guest in a rowdy tourist house for Moulin Rouge, but the audience wasn't so much poorly-behaved as ill-informed about protocols.
I have complained bitterly over the years about the misuse of devices - at the LCT King and I on Easter Sunday, the audience simply refused to put away phones, the palpable sense of entitlement overrode any announced restrictions. And I always come back to that: a percentage of people feel the high prices and the "event" status of performances entitle them to seek real time souvenirs.
As armchair sociologist, I'll just opine that some corrupted more in the culture has anointed these phones we covet with supremacy over foundational etiquette. I've heard people explain why a phone left on and face down in a lap - checked every 10-minutes, that flash of light ever annoying - is perfectly acceptable because dire news is expected. Everyone has a "good" reason, from "my geriatric father is traveling alone by plane" to "I'm awaiting biopsy results." When you remind these privileged folks that connections can be made at intermission, they haughtily insist that won't do. I think of Carrie Fisher's famous line, "instant gratification isn't fast enough." To me, it sums up this egregious dependence on alerts arriving in our dark laps
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 3/24/26 at 08:59 AM