Well, there's the if. I didn't quite feel like she tore it up by any measure, but that was six months ago. So we'll see.
It's clearly a choice, and it's a choice in a lot of different respects -- it's obviously somewhat plot-driven, because the cathartic moment, as penguin said, IS Being Alive. This is just leading up to that. But, this is also Raul's show, and everything is making that really clear. That explosive applause is his, and only his. Yes, Joanne was Stritch's role and that's what people went to see -- but that's flipped in Bobby's favor now.
I think the inevitable comparison to the concept in Sweeney Todd is a bit unfortunate, really, because it's going to lead to the failure to realize that yes, it's the same concept, but it's acting totally differently. In Sweeney, it served as a characterization technique on a very individualized level, and here it's a big, sweeping conceit -- it's about group conformity. It works in its own way for each show, and clearly it's going to come down to a matter of technical preference, but some of the people who have the capability to love this show most are people who loved Doyle's work in Sweeney, so I hope it's not harmed by the comparisons.
It's interesting, Gypsy, that you said it had no purpose with the EXCEPTION of Being Alive, because the way the conceit works, if it weren't there the entire time, Being Alive wouldn't work. Being Alive has the purpose you've afforded it BECAUSE the instruments are there throughout -- so isn't that their purpose? I felt like their entire purpose WAS to bring you to that moment when Raul sits down at the piano.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 10/31/06 at 12:38 PM