Election 2024 — Page 12

Kamala Harris is now speaking at the Campaign Headquarters (MSNBC, for one) President Biden on the phone, and the Second Gentleman just spoke.

P.S. Who would we like as running mate?

Newsom is out on constitutional grounds, I believe, so that leaves Kelly or Cooper? Buttigieg possibly, but sadly I agree with uncageg…

South Florida said: "Pauly3, become Pauly4, or just go somewhere where people of your ilk dwell. I don't go on Dump community web sites, you influence nobody here, people who come here to chat are largely Liberal and repulsed by people like you."

This message board isn't exclusive to emotionally weak snowflakes. Liberals who are repulsed by me are also repulsed by merit, truth and reasonableness. So I'm not the least bit offended or put off by your expressed sentiment.

Jay Lerner-Z said: "P.S. Who would we like as running mate?

Newsom is out on constitutional grounds, I believe, so that leaves Kelly or Cooper? Buttigieg possibly, but sadly I agree with uncageg…"

I'm happy to keep Newsom here in California as our Governor.....for now.

As I posted earlier, Pete Buttigieg is my choice. He would be our first openly LGBTQ Vice President. But whatever choice Kamala Harris makes as her running mate, I'm in.

And speaking of Pete. My go-to source for most things political is Rachel Maddow on MSNBC. She will have "Special Coverage" tonight (8 PM ET) and I believe (but am not certain) that Pete is one of her guests. Perhaps other "possible candidates" as well?

Updated On: 7/22/24 at 06:47 PM

Pauly3 said: "Much the same could be said about Biden. Racist? Check. Convicted felon, not just yet. Draft-dodger? Check. Wannabe dictator? Maybe. Sexual abuser? Check. And more."

Dude! Haven't you heard? Biden ISN'T RUNNING. This race is between a CONVICTED FELON and (probably) Kamala Harris. Biden is no longer part of the picture.

If you intend to continue spewing your MAGA lies and filth here, you really need to keep up with the rest of us. Or move on. Seriously.

Updated On: 7/22/24 at 06:56 PM

Highland Guy said: "Dude! Haven't you heard? Biden ISN'T RUNNING. This race is between a CONVICTED FELON and (probably) Kamala Harris. Biden is no longer part of the picture."

Are you suggesting your support wasn't ALL IN on Biden right up until Biden dropped out, you know, like a day ago?

Emotional? Check. Simpleton? Check. Coward? Check. Snowflake? Check.

Highland Guy said: "Pauly3 said: "Highland Guy said: "As I posted earlier, Pete Buttigieg is my choice. He would be our first openly LGBTQ Vice President. Bur whatever choice Kamala Harris makes as her running mate, I'm in."

I said, "You mean if Buttigieg is not picked, you won't conclude Harris is a homophobe? Ha ha."

You conveniently left out that I said: "Whatever choice Kamala Harris makes as her running mate, I'm in. You're a fool. Be gone, troll."

Wrong, I didn't leave out what you said about giving your support regardless of who Harris picks.

My joke hit a little too close to home, did it? You don't like when humor or any other method is used to hold up a mirror, do ya?

Pauly, to me you at least serve a purpose here by providing me with some insight into the dark side.

Why Trump? There were many other candidates for the nomination. Ones with the same policies but with significantly less baggage.

Pauly3 said: "Highland Guy said: "Reported to BWW for violating the rules for participating in these threads? DOUBLE CHECK"

Another tantrum? Check, again."

REPORTED AGAIN

Jay Lerner-Z said: "Pauly, to me you at least serve a purpose here by providing me with some insight into the dark side.

Why Trump? There were many other candidates for the nomination. Ones with the same policies but with significantly less baggage."

I argue against the shooting of Trump based on extraordinarily weak (perceived) justification, and you have argued for it - and you failed to successfully argue a single point in our disagreement. You dodged the point, continuously. I have argued you and others have gone way too far in the nonsense comparing Trump to Hitler. We disagree on that. That doesn't make me evil. But somehow, you have concluded I am from some evil "dark side". Preposterous.

Why Trump? Because he is one of only two candidates, and his policies as leader of the country more so align with mine than do the current Democrat option(s). Why do you assume I wanted Trump prior to his winning the nomination? I know why. It's because you cannot think straight and refuse to allow ANY nuance when it comes to an argument that has the appearance of ANY type of support for Trump, such as the idea it was NOT Okay to shoot him.

Democratic Texas Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, 74, lost her life to cancer on July 19. She was a wonderful woman and an exceptional public servant. As we discuss the approaching elections, I will truly miss her presence, her political savvy and her insight. She will be missed, but I'm confident her spirit is with us. Rest in peace, dear lady.

Highland Guy said: "Highland Guy said: "My source formost things political is Rachel Maddow on MSNBC. She will have "Special Coverage" tonight (8 PM ET) and I believe (but am not certain) that Pete is one of her guests. Perhaps other "possible candidates" as well?"

UPDATE: Yes, Pete will be interviewed by Rachel.

"

The two most mentioned names today were Josh Shapiro & Mark Kelly.