There's a lot of good thinking in this thread. I think labeling the vote as racist serves no cause, not the triumph of talent or the further evolution of civil rights. I remember when Michael Jackson played the race card against Sony, it had a shelf-life of about 20 minutes, since the music world is all about the bottom line: money. Sony paid a small fortune for Jackson, assuming profits were inevitable. His work didn't deliver, but hardly because Sony opted to hold back their expensive ticket.
IDOL this season is nothing if not a showcase for some of the best African-American singing talent in America. There are three soul/R&B divas, all gifted, all polished. Wasn't it inevitable they might cancel one another out a bit? All three women are distinctive, but they are a category of singer, and many people, even those admiring them, probably lump them together -- not because of their race, but the PERCEIVED sameness of their style -- and turn to the others. It's painful because the others aren't in the same league. But really, if you built a show and had, say, Aretha, Whitney, and Gladys K, there would be people wanting Celine and Faith Hill. And Harry Connick. That's the fickle nature of American taste. People like variety on IDOL, so they no doubt root -- with votes -- for singers who provide it. Even when those singers are mediocre or worse.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 4/27/04 at 06:44 PM