The derangement demonstrated is wow-like:
MysteriousLady said, "the ABC moderators put the pathetic Dana Bash and Jake Tapper to shame. I guess ABC isn't okay with airing unchecked lies."
You failed to notice the ABC moderators were perfectly OK with airing unchecked lies....when Harris lied. Tying Trump to Project 2025, claiming he called for the execution of the Central Park Five, repeating the lies constantly repeated of Trump's comments regarding Charlottesville are just a few examples of her unchecked lies.
The problem is, you don't know those are lies because you (and so many) believe whatever is repeatedly asserted and allow yourselves to become "useful idiots" and then repeat the same lies. And then we end up with a bunch of people the likes of so many here.
No, it was Muir and Davis who were pathetic. Bash and Tapper, typically pathetic, showed much more restraint and professionalism in the prior debate.
kdogg36 said, "Anyone who supports Trump at this point deserves to have a bullet put in their skull."
It is Trump's big fat orange middle finger, directed at the likes of you, that contribute to enthusiasm for Trump's re-election.
James885 said, Maybe it's our collective short-term memory at work here....but the simple fact of the matter is that Trump pushed to ignore the will of the voters and he lead an attempt to overthrow the government. Even worse, he's the only president to not only be impeached twice, but also indicted and convicted. That alone should give voters pause - especially voters in the swing states whose votes he tried to throw out in 2020."
Just more Trump Derangement Syndrome. Trump truly believed and still believes the vote was tainted. He fought, lost and remains unconvinced. That's delusion, not ignoring the will of the voters, nor did he lead any legitimate attempt to overthrow the government. January 6th was an awful riot, but it was not an overthrow attempt. His impeachments and indictments and convictions are suspect and more likely entirely politically motivated than based on merit. Had Biden done everything Trump did, none of the impeachments, indictments and convictions would be in the history books. The decision to be made - and the merits to base such decisions are not so clear cut as you think it is.
Sutton Ross said, "The craziest part of the debate for me was when he called abortions "executions" and the left kill babies after they are born. When Linsey Davis (so much better than Dana) stated that there is "no state where it is legal to kill a baby after birth", I cannot believe she kept a straight face. Unreal."
Trump was reiterating what Governor Northam had previously implied about babies being born and allowed to die if that is what the mother and doctor decided. Not unusual, Trump's language was over the top in attempting to articulate this. Trump was pointing out the absurd level of radicalism that exists within the opposing party and was demonstrating this through his observation of the extent to which some have said they are willing to go (and we all know many Democrats will not state any limitation). Inarticulate and over the top, yes. Wrong, no, no he was not. Trump did not say it was currently legal to kill newborn babies, so Lindsey Davis' retort was both unprofessional and incorrect.
Regarding binau's comments, they are far more reasonable and worthy of thoughtful responses (should you choose to respond) than so many others here. Given historical patterns demonstrated on this board, it is no surprise not everyone who has chosen to respond is capable of thoughtful responses.
MysteriousLady made a comment about Sutton Ross that has since been deleted. It is peculiar what the moderators will allow (kdogg's??) and what they won't. For the record MysteriousLady, I believe your comments about Sutton Ross were based on what you have (accurately) observed of him/her.