Because for some reason there is an association of "pretty" with "good", and fat in this day and age is considered "ugly". Even if your face is pretty, most people will say "you have such a pretty face" instead of saying you're so pretty. Like their face is the only beautiful part about them.
Go back to Dickens. For the most part the good people were beautiful, the bad people ugly. It's sad we haven't come that far since the 1800's. Why do leading ladies need to be thin in general? Really most of the time there is no reason other than a directors/casting directors personal preference for what they view as beauty. Heck, even a lot of roles where the character isn't constantly described as beautiful are usually cast with an attractive person. Why does Laurie need to be beautiful? Or Curly? or Judd physically ugly? Do we care more about pretty people? Value their lives more? A study recently came out saying fat women had more sex than thin women, so I don't think its that fat girls just can't be sexy/attractive.
If you audition for most roles in theater as a woman, you see words like "pretty" "attractive" "beautiful" in 95 percent of notices. Not that the characters within the shows needs to be considered attractive. It's usually an arbitrary choice made by the playright/director/producer. And it's really quite sad.
Then check the men's notices and look for mentions of how attractive or sexy the men should be. They're there about 10 percent of the time. Its really quite interesting.
People argue that theater should be a fantasy...where everyone is gorgeous and perfect and everything is black and white. Happy Endings abound.
Me, I like seeing a bit of everyone where things tend to be very very grey.
"This ocean runs more dark and deep than you may think you know...I'll be the fear of the fire at sea."
-Marie Christine
Updated On: 12/16/08 at 06:37 PM