I know this will make Blaxx ecstatic . Jeremy Jordan on NY 1 stated he did not know why Frank had become the critics whipping boy. Neither do I. I guess the only one who cannot be allowed to write a "power ballad" (whatever the hell that means) is Frank. Even if I still consider Jekyll & Hyde one of the worst shows I've seen on Broadway, I don't wish him bad. But if I must have to repeat myself for the nth time, there's seems to be a case of really bad memory around BWW.
As far as I remember, there was little disagreement that his past few shows were REALLY bad, and very few would actually disagree with the critics, am I wrong here? Or was there unanimous praise for Civil War, Dracula, Wonderland, etc.? No, there wasn't. In fact, the trashing and bashing around here was rarely questioned.
Therefore, the critics aren't wrong here. He is like a student who had continously gotten well deserved F's. Suddenly, he shows improvement (and unanimously the reviews emphasize this improvement) and he gets a C-. He deserves that C-. But no! What posters around here wanted, was for them to go from an F to an A+. Well, sorry, but Bonnie & Clyde is not an A+ show.
Of course, elevating the man who gave us all a headache with his past few shows into martyrdom seems much more exciting, I'm sure.
But I'll only believe the critics "have it in" for a composer who continously keeps giving us amazing work to only get trashed, and not for the one who gave us some god awful material and just recently happened to show improvement.
If his next few shows are genius and the critics won't acknowledge the fact, I'd be more skeptical. But this is not the case so far, I actually sat through his crappy shows and never disagreed with the reviewers. Try to call vendetta on more deserving artists.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE