Fair warning if you're someone who likes a strong plot line: all the way back to its out-of-town run in Manchester, one could summarize every review, hit or miss, as "Great cast, terrific songs, you'll have a wonderful time, muttermutterstorywhatstorymutter." They still can. As a fan of Jim Steinman, who wrote the score, that bugs me a little bit.
Every Steinman fan I've ever known has talked for years about how all of Jim's music is, in some way, part of Neverland, this sci-fi rock take on Peter Pan he's been developing basically for almost 50 years that morphed into Bat. Especially considering how many songs on the Bat albums were legit originally written for this storyline, I guess I thought that it would all... I dunno... finally make sense or something, that it'd lock into place and we'd all see the brilliance of his intention. I thought the story was meant to matter; this was supposed to be the show where people saw it and finally understood the part each song played, and the whole thing made more sense than it did as a collection of albums and singles down the years.
Evidently I was wrong. After 50 years and countless interviews where Jim told a much more interesting story, I can't help but feel let down. At best, the barest bones of that are on display in this show. It's like seeing one of Leonardo's underpaintings before he added color and detail.
But don't take my word for it. As Ethel Merman purportedly once said, "I thought it was a piece of ****, but the audience laughed and cried, so what the **** do I know?"
Formerly gvendo2005
Broadway Legend
joined: 5/1/05
Blocked: After Eight, suestorm, david_fick, emlodik, lovebwy, Dave28282, joevitus, BorisTomashevsky, Seb28
Updated On: 4/26/18 at 03:13 PM