UncleCharlie said: "
I tried to explain it in relation to the role in Funny Girl which was the whole point of the discussion in the first place so even someone wrapped in ignorance and filled with arrogance could understand it. But you know what you know and that seems to be the end of it for you. Save your faux outrage dude. I'm not impressed. You seem to need to play the provocateur and not just in relation to my comment. So go have your fun."
Im happy to (unintentionally) play the role of provocateur if my honest comments do that, but lets just recap: i said something, to which you responded all arrogant and hostile that "you'll sit and wait for me to explain!" as if I said something wildly incorrect when, well, I didnt and, in fact, you did. so if this is an example of me being provocative (by reminding people that Judaism has an ethnic, genetic component to it, but AGREEING that I think anyone of any ethnicity should play this role), then yeah, i guess im guilty.
and please dont confuse my exasperation with outrage, which exasperation is most certainly not faux.
now, let the hounds continue to snipe at Beanie Feldstein who committed the great crime of being mediocre/OK in a role on Bway, something thats never happened before and, thanks to the many musical warriors here, will sure never happen again. When we last left our gang of detectives, someone had half heartedly suggested she was attending a Pride event, which then turned into an actual suggestion that she called out to go to a Pride party. What will she (fictitiously) do next?