Wow, what a wild situation. Until I read the part about the stop clause being invoked several months ago, my first thought was that the Beetlejuice producers have a promising law suit on their hands. I wonder if this show will set a precedent for some sort of “turnaround” clause as an addendum to the stop clause.
Either way, Beetlejuice is really a victim of the harsh realities of capitalism, and to a lesser extent, just some unlucky timing; if Rudin’s search for a theatre had not lined up with Beetlejuice’s low-grossing weeks, the Shuberts would have had no immediate incentive to kick them out.
Unless the stop clause territory has no expiration date. Could someone clarify that? I understand that the Shuberts invoked the stop clause around the time that the grosses fell below the limit. But HYPOTHETICALLY, if Rudin asked for the theatre NOW, could the Shuberts still invoke the stop clause even though the qualifying grosses happened months ago?
Updated On: 12/9/19 at 06:10 PM