Does Melchior rape Wendla in SPRING AWAKENING?
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:10am
Basically, I said he essentially raped her because he knew about sex and the consequences and she didn't, regardless of whether she says yes at that time.
And everyone else said that it was ok because Wendla loved Melchior.
And I banged my head against the wall. Repeatedly.
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:12am
https://forum.broadwayworld.com/readmessage.cfm?boardname=bway&thread=922100
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:13am
Updated On: 3/23/07 at 03:13 AM
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:46am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:57am
I haven't read the original script, but my friends who have read it say that it would definitely be considered rape in Wenekind's original version, and they toned it down for the musical.
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:57am
EDIT: gumbo2 beat me to it...
Updated On: 3/23/07 at 03:57 AM
Posted: 3/23/07 at 3:58am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 4:01am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 4:03am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 4:25am
What does it say in the original play?
Posted: 3/23/07 at 4:51am
Well, it is pretty obvious if you look at the picture in the show's logo...it's not a huge plot point that is going to ruin anything for you.
Posted: 3/23/07 at 6:17am
oh that and you mentioned names in the actual subject heading... maybe i would have been less upset in not knowing who did what in the actual musical
Updated On: 3/23/07 at 06:17 AM
Posted: 3/23/07 at 6:23am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 8:18am
This occurs a lot in the world today; women in conservative countries are (even now) not told about sex & when they marry, it is essentially legalized rape.
Updated On: 3/23/07 at 08:18 AM
Posted: 3/23/07 at 8:35am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 9:57am
"In Oz, the verb is douchifizzation." PRS
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:04am
This is true. The Atlantic version was in fact played as a rape as it is written in Wedekind's play. But I'm assuming the producers and/or Michael Mayer decided they needed to make it consensual for Broadway audiences.
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:06am
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:09am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:17am
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:37am
Agreed, totally. Part of consent is knowing what you're getting into, and Wendla obviously had no idea. They might've been the same age, but he's clearly the more informed and experienced of the two, and so it's still predatory on his part.
I also agree that it's a cop-out to change the scene so that she "consents" at the last second. I gather that we're supposed to like Melchior more than we would have if she had said no, but I didn't, and I wish that they had just gone all the way and portrayed it as rape. Melchior would've been a far more interesting character if he weren't shoehorned into being the unambiguous "hero" of the piece.
Updated On: 3/23/07 at 10:37 AM
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:52am
Updated On: 3/23/07 at 10:52 AM
Posted: 3/23/07 at 10:54am
In the original play, yes, it was a rape.
Here, trying to be darling and make the handsome Melchior a sweetheart, they make it... consensual? Sort of?
It's always distrubed me that they tread so lightly and delicately over the issue of rape.
Posted: 3/23/07 at 11:11am
She gives in, she wanted him.
She said no in the beginning just because of the social pressure she faced in that time.
BroadwayWorld TV