Great Dame said: "RippedMan said: "This show needs absolutely zero narration. What a boring and safe choice."
I agree with you on this one. Less was better but I could live with no narration, especially with a story people know so well. It didn't ruin it for me by any means, but I think cutting at least most of the narration would serve the show well."
Agreed, but cut ALL of it. If they cut most of it, it would mean only a few moments are narrated and that would just be weird to watch. Why only narrate a few scenes and not the rest? That is asking for yet another show without a clear direction. I'm not sure who had the idea that narration was necessary or a good idea, but even if it were a good idea, it's not necessary. Narration is an odd storytelling device that either works or it doesn't. And it certainly can't be half assed in it's usage, and when it is, you can tell and it's almost always painful to witness. It has to be used as part of the story itself, ala "Joseph", Evita, and Little Shop, which use narration to great effect because it's made to intertwine with the story quite seamlessly, but it can't be used to merely "tell" rather than "show". The narration in Frozen seems to be more of a rehashing of events narrated by a character that hardly had any point to the story to begin with. Aka "Telling" me what's happened when most audiences already know it, and just want to be "shown" the story.