Posted: 5/2/15 at 8:42am
The music is beyond the scope of the topic because you're talking about what's proper for a child to sing, which is about the substance of the material of the song, not the form and musical aesthetic of the song. For your sake, since you're stuck on it, let's pretend it's widely accepted that the music is "hideous". We still have the second issue of what's improper subject-matter for children to present to people with "delicate sensibilities." What I am confused about is if you take out the idea that "Ring of Keys" has sexual undertones, which is what many thought you were getting at with your initial post(s), then what I don't get is what is it about the song that is so offensive to those with "delicate sensibilities". That's a key piece of what I am missing with your conclusions about the song being "improper".
And no, without the sexual reading of the song, your former posts do not explain what is so offensive or improper about it. You just make a conclusory statement without explaining why it is offensive or improper for a child to sing that song.
Of course, unless you meant that it was improper for a child to sing a song set to "hideous music" that is "sick" and "whining", but I doubt you would think that it was only improper for a child and not improper for all people. Also, your other posts clearly separate the music from the topic of what is proper and improper for "children to present to an audience."
Updated On: 5/2/15 at 08:42 AM
