For the next RENT revival...

...maybe, just maybe, Mimi could be a gay boy?

The brilliant writer/AIDS activist Sarah Schulman has always complained that the gay characters in RENT are sidelined. I sorta get what she means.

We're not talking about the BEST characters, or your FAVORITE characters, but arguably the three MAIN characters in RENT are all straight. Sure, one (just one) is a marginalized person, but I have to agree with Sarah that the only hit musical to tackle the AIDS epidemic has a straight AIDS infected couple as the lead love story.

I'm not sure it it would be allowed, however (and I don't know if it's an urban legend, but) a high school production changed every reference to AIDS to diabetes. (think about that for ten minutes and then laugh for twenty). So maybe the Larsen family would, maybe go for it...?

Has this been tried anywhere? And I don't mean making Mimi trans. It might dilute Angel's character (although...thinking about it...is Angel a transvestite or transexual...? If he/she is the latter there isn't actually a gay male romance in the show as it stands...)

I hope I don't hurt too many butts by just floating this idea...

Broadway61004 said: "If Jonathan Larson was still alive, then I could see this as a possibility. But given that not only is he not around to approve a major change like this but of course died tragically while still working on the piece, I can't imagine his estate giving this the green light. The reality is Rent is still very much a rough draft with many things being changed right up until the time he died. Had he still been alive, I'm sure there would have been a lot more changes before it came to Broadway. But from the moment he's passed, there hasn't been a single word in the script altered, so I can't imagine suddenly an entire character being rewritten."

Not true, there have been many changes to the text of Rent over the years (the most notable being Rent Remixed in London) approved by the estate. Though I think with Rent Remixed they realized the danger of approving such sweeping changes so they're unlikely to do it again, but even the Off-Broadway Revival and Rent Live on Fox made changes to lyrics here and there.

It’s true, there have been changes here and there to the script. I remember, for example that one of them was, when the characters were delivering their eulogies at Angel’s funeral, everyone onstage said the the first couple of words together, then the character would continue on their own. I know that Grief put that in the revival off Broadway and I think that that started in the national tour with Adam and Anthony in it. Another example, is that when Larson found out Idina was from Long Island, he than made her character from Long Island too. Hence the line, “you can take the girl out of Hicksville, but you can’t take the Hicksville out of the girl.” When they started to tour the show they changed Hicksville to Jersey.

I don’t think that changing Mimi to a gay male makes sense in the confines of the story. I believe that one of the things that Larson was trying to show was that AIDS wasn’t limited to the gay community. And, I feel he did a good job showing that.

Also, I take what Schulman said about this idea with a grain of salt. She wrote a novel that came out around the time that Larson was working on Rent. And then, tried to sue for plagiarism after she saw the show saying that Larson took things right from her novel and never asked permission nor gave her a credit that she felt she was owed.

g.d.e.l.g.i. said: "Broadway61004 said: "The reality is Rent is still very much a rough draft with many things being changed right up until the time he died. Had he still been alive, I'm sure there would have been a lot more changes before it came to Broadway."

I don't know that that's as true as people have made it out to be. It needed further work, but there wasn't going to be another major overhaul like there was in the fall of 1995 and any revisions would have been more incremental. It's easy to groan about the plot being messy, but it's La Bohème put through the filter of someone who was really into music during the age of the concept album, where the big moments and emotions were what mattered over intricacies in the story. (The book Boho Days, by former BWW contributor J. Collis, goes into this in some detail. It's pricey, being a quality self-published effort, but well worth the read.)

Islander_fan said: "Another example, is that when Larson found out Idina was from Long Island, he than made her character from Long Island too. Hence the line, “you can take the girl out of Hicksville, but you can’t take the Hicksville out of the girl.” When they started to tour the show they changed Hicksville to Jersey."

That was more of a change for people outside of the NY metro area who wouldn't know what the hell Hicksville was. The reference to Ted Koppel was changed to CNN and the Circle Line to the Statue of Liberty for the same reason."

No, I get that. I know why those were changed. But, they didn’t need to be. I don’t know, I guess, maybe that the idea of altering things when the guy who created it has zero say in the matter is he that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

g.d.e.l.g.i. said: "Broadway61004 said: "The reality is Rent is still very much a rough draft with many things being changed right up until the time he died. Had he still been alive, I'm sure there would have been a lot more changes before it came to Broadway."

I don't know that that's as true as people have made it out to be. It needed further work, but there wasn't going to be another major overhaul like there was in the fall of 1995 and any revisions would have been more incremental. It's easy to groan about the plot being messy, but it's La Bohème put through the filter of someone who was really into music during the age of the concept album, where the big moments and emotions were what mattered over intricacies in the story. (The book Boho Days, by former BWW contributor J. Collis, goes into this in some detail. It's pricey, being a quality self-published effort, but well worth the read.)"

Rent obviously works great as it is--not at all arguing that. And no, I didn't mean to imply there was going to be a major overhaul (like there was from the first workshop to the NYTW production). But my point is Larson was still making a lot of changes to the text right up until the time he died (for instance, "Take Me or Leave Me" was completely rewritten multiple times just during the rehearsal period at NYTW). So I think it's safe to say that had he got to see the production (remember, other than dress rehearsals and workshops he never actually saw Rent performed), he would have ended up making some more changes (likely nothing major, but still several more edits).

And yes, I shouldn't have said nothing has been changed in other productions--as others have pointed out, a word or two here and there, folks saying lines together instead of separately, etc. But my point was, nothing major (no cut songs or new songs added, no major character rewrites, no sequences of dialogue completely rewritten, etc.). So the idea the estate would suddenly approve completely changing one of the characters just doesn't seem likely.

Let's not talk of Rent: Live again.....for the rest of our lives.

aimeric said: "Tag said: "Islander_fan said: "Another example, is that when Larson found out Idina was from Long Island, he than made her character from Long Island too. Hence the line, “you can take the girl out of Hicksville, but you can’t take the Hicksville out of the girl.” When they started to tour the show they changed Hicksville to Jersey."

Wow, after all these years...I always thought Hicksville was a reference to "hicks" (ie. country folk) and not a real place!"



Lol, same. Now as an adult, I know Hicksville, Long Island, but as a kid growing up in Florida, listening to Rent I just assumed they meant "hicksville" in the broader use of the term: i.e., a town that's "bumf**k." (Or at least, that's how I commonly heard "hicksville" used where I came from...is that not a thing in other parts of the country...?) Thus my confusion over why it would even need to be changed in the libretto."

That was definitely an issue with Rent on the road and why the first national tour in particular got so many walkouts (besides the subject matter, which some people didn't realize what they were getting into). It's really such a New York show that for many people across the country they just couldn't relate to it. But on the plus side, I give them credit for not altering it for the road,