Posted: 8/21/25 at 9:24am
I can anticipate the number of posts schooling me in the economics of B'way and the booking of theaters. Yet the exit of John Proctor is a Villain is just a strange collateral damage in this practice. At yesterday's Wednesday matinee the full Booth was brimming with something we Wednesday afternoon folks seldom see: a house with every demographic, at least half of the theater occupied by a mysterious group: people under 40 at a straight play. If you've seen this production you know that a decided electricity crackles in the air. Before and after, but particularly as the play unfolds and offers up its cascade of plot revelations.
The play and its audacious staging have touched a nerve, and the full house gasps at two points in the storytelling are stunning moments. Attending this play becomes an all too rare event: a genuinely shared experience. This production has continued to play at 100%+ capacity, even after its star (in an ensemble piece) exited circa 4th of July. It seems to me that it could've easily extended until January 1. Because it has the most coveted attribute: word of mouth. Talk to people in the rest room lines (and this play attracts so many women, they use the Booth's men's room both before and after the intermission-less show.) Some people were back for a third time, bringing BFFs, parents, in one case, a beloved teacher. Yes, I know, it's August. September Wednesday matinee would look different. But I'm an old white male boomer seeing Gen Z and Gen X folks racing to get seats because of a close and I despair. We can't get those people to shows with enough regularity to be cavalier about the occurance.
I am delighted to see another Samuel D. Hunter play on B'way, and to have Laurie Metcalf back. How wonderful it might've been to see that production running next to John Proctor.
Updated On: 8/21/25 at 09:24 AM