joevitus said: "She herself owes us nothing (and has given us plenty), but when a show that is not being made as a broadcast for her to watch and is announced as LIZA! at 80!, and when it apparently was not made clear to some of the performers as well as a whole bunch of the audience that she would in no way be taking part, then someone does owe those people something. There is a level of deception-for-a-cash-grab going on here that it's fair to acknowledge. Does not make it her own personal fault."
Totally agreed. Call me dumb and naive, but I for one assumed she'd be there and take part in some shape or form to a show named "Liza at 80!". I spent a lot of money booking the best seats possible seconds after the pre-sales started, I wanted SO BAD to be part of a loooong standing ovation and give my humble thanks to somebody who totally shaped my taste in music, dance and shows since It was 18 and seeing Cabaret blew my mind (some 45 years ago!).
When Lorna showed up and sang (beautifully, by the way), it was crystal clear to me that the show was written to get Liza to appear with New York New York (whether she'd sing it or not). Which had to be the original intent, come on! And I do understand how frail Liza is and plans had to change. But then I CANNOT understand that a short message of love from Liza wasn't recorded and displayed. And I understand EVEN LESS that somebody like Michael or Lorna didn't say something at the end of the show, e.g. "We're sorry Liza couldn't be there, she sends her love".
Frankly, I am now very worried about Liza's health. And this whole thing left me a little heartbroken, with a bad taste in my mouth on top. And I certainly agree that there is no way any of it was Liza's fault.
(as to the show, I found it terribly uneven, some performances were excellent, others fell very flat, and some choices made my eyes roll. I guess it just proves that properly performing a Liza song is INCREDIBLY HARD, even when you're a seasoned Broadway performer).
Updated On: 6/27/26 at 12:49 AM