The Distinctive Baritone said: "
“I personally feel that the billing should've been changed to indicate Mr. Murphy as the star at this point. It's really not fair to call him an understudy when he's regularly performing the role at least six times per week, and has been doing so for some time now. He's also a great ambassador for the show, with a strong and enthusiastic social media presence (I've not seen anything on social media from Mr. Cortes since the tour began)."
I think it is a contractual/union issue. They would have to terminate Cortes’ contract to “officially”give Murphy the role. Also, as an understudy, they can pay him less and save more money."
That sounds plausible, but how long can someone not perform a role and still be fulfilling the terms of his/her contract?
==> this board is a nest of vipers <==
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene"
- Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage