Then you're reading me wrong -- or perhaps not reading at all. I'm not disparaging his intentions if I think that they're GOOD intentions. If I think they're good, it's completely paradoxical to accuse me of disparaging him, and hypocritical to deny what you've done. For you to tell me what my intentions are and then to tell me you're not doing so is a bit silly, no? Yes, iluv's information was benign and I admitted even useful and much appreciated. But something has clearly gone wrong, and I can see why other people are upset. Intent does not automatically, without care, breed proper action and outcome. I see where the need to defend yourself comes from, because it's petty that people don't believe it to be true and whatever. There's an implicit difference between berating him consistently for exposure of the relationship under any circumstances and disagreeing with the outcome. I happen to be of the opinion that there's just a different way to handle this all. To tell me that I am disparaging HIM when I'm disagreeing with a detail of what happened is pathetically melodramatic.
Don't lecture me on manners. You don't know me, and further, I am not a child.
nom, I dignify you and your diatribe with no further response than this. Suddenly the protectorate?
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 9/25/06 at 03:04 PM