I'm disheartened that people here can't tell the difference between "carrying a tune" and "singing."
Richard Gere SANG in Chicago. He nailed those numbers, and belted them to the rafters.
Catherine Zeta-Jones SANG in Chicago. She was brilliant too, in all respects.
Helena Bonham-Carter CARRIED A TUNE in Sweeney. She hit the notes. Nothing more, nothing less. Her acting was great though.
Johnny Depp and Rene Zellweger landed somewhere in between "singing" and "carrying a tune." They were both fine with the vocals, though.
Why is this so hard to figure out, or to delineate? A performer who navigates simply through a song, landing 'respectably" on the notes vs. someone who actually shows some skill, vocal prowess and talent when they sing.
Oy!
Ray--I thought the same thing at first, that this new "Cinema Italiano" number would replace "Follies Bergeres." The fact that it doesn't makes me wonder if the film is going to be production-number-tangent-heavy, taking away from the people and the story.
It sounds like Marshall wants to keep it very "sexy" though, and there's nothing like the eye candy of long-legged, scantily-clad, beautiful women parading around on the screen to get the straight guys into the theatre. It sure worked for Chicago. And I think he's right on target there. I just worry about the structure of the film being weird or a tad over-blown. Are they going to cut the "Grand Canal" stuff, or will that be yet another giant production number with long-legged women?
Bottom line: I trust him. And I'm looking forward to seeing how his "Nine" turns out.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22