best12bars said: "One question I think should be asked ... is "aging badly" the same thing as "couldn't be performed in a time setting of the present day?"
Shows like "A Chorus Line" or "How to Succeed" work well as period pieces, but you can't put them on in 2016 with it being a "current" setting. I would even say "Rent" works well as a period piece.
"
Right--which is my argument for Company as well . As I said earlier, the current revisions from 95/96 in the licensed script already often feel dated already (the voice mail) and the actual textual changes (lyrics but especially dialogue wise) to update the piece from its 1970 "now" setting are oddly half-assed. Joanne still reads Life and does very 1970 New York things like attending a Mahler concert (of course people still like Mahler, but it was briefly something of a phenomenon) and wearing kaftans, people have answering services, etc, etc. But even more so the very fact that Bobby is 35, deemed full on middle aged, and still single certainly would not be as much of an issue in 2016 New York. Add to that that Sondheim's music, seems to me anyway, to be influenced by late 60s Bacharach style pop... (The gay scene--which some claim was written and cut from the original and some claim was brand new--regardless in it they use the term "ball" as a euphemism for sex which, at least to me, does not sound like anything a 30 something year old nowadays would say). And, I admit, without the oh so 1970 rocksichord synth lose a lot.
The show still plays well enough if its revised form, but it gains nothing IMHO and I suspect in future decades they will just go full stop back to 1970. Some major productions have verged that way--the Kennedy Center Sondheim Celebration production reverted to the 70s and original orchestrations. The NPH concert version also seemed to be vaguely set back in 1970. I don't think they should go full 1970 kitsch by any means, but like most productions of A Chorus Line now, I do think it should keep that setting.
Updated On: 3/30/16 at 08:06 PM