NETWORK
NETWORK
NETWORK#1
Posted: 8/4/18 at 1:58pm
Another theatre board this week said Network was headed to the Cort this fall? Any information verifying this?
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/15/14
NETWORK#3
Posted: 8/4/18 at 3:30pm
Will Van Hove still have audiences eating dinner onstage for no reason?
That production looked HUGE in London, I don't know how it would fit in the little Cort.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/5/14
NETWORK#6
Posted: 8/4/18 at 3:50pmWhere do you have confirmation of this. I will be in NYC this winter and I WILL DIE if I get to witness this production.
Stand-by Joined: 5/14/14
NETWORK#8
Posted: 8/4/18 at 6:16pmThere is definitely interest in making this happen, but I highly doubt it’ll happen in a Broadway house. The production at the National was enormous. Although they managed to pull off the staging of Angels with some staging alterations, so who knows.
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/14/05
NETWORK#9
Posted: 8/4/18 at 7:28pm
What was altered with Angels? I actually never saw Part 2 on Broadway, so curious if they did the ending the same way.
NETWORK#10
Posted: 8/4/18 at 8:47pm
Is the Lyttleton that much larger than a large Broadway house? I really don't know. I'm asking! Seemed a slightly above average size when I was there... but nothing comparable to, say, the Olivier stage.
NETWORK#11
Posted: 8/4/18 at 9:28pm
My friends who saw it at the National thought that Cranston was excellent, loved the way the studio was conceived and the restaurant on stage added immensely to the experience...but there were reservations about the text. And if anyone can camouflage a text's weakness it's Ivo with his theatrical pyrotechnics. I'm surprised if it is indeed the Cort- Rudin must not be involved!! Though I think it's preferable to the Lyceum or the Belasco.
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/15/14
NETWORK#12
Posted: 8/4/18 at 9:46pm
KJisgroovy said: "Is the Lyttleton that much larger than a large Broadway house? I really don't know. I'm asking! Seemed a slightly above average size when I was there... but nothing comparable to, say, the Olivier stage."
The Lyttelton stage is 52 feet wide (about 15 feet wider than the Cort). I think it's significantly deeper than the average Broadway house, though, because I remember interviews about ANGELS talking about how the design had to be reimagined to fit the much shallower Neil Simon stage.
NETWORK#13
Posted: 8/4/18 at 11:22pm
If it does happen, I hope it's not with Michelle Dockery, who couldn't be more miscast in the Faye Dunaway role. I'd love to see Cranston as Howard Beale, though.
NETWORK#16
Posted: 8/5/18 at 12:58am
Are they bringing the entire cast over from across the pond?
NETWORK#17
Posted: 8/5/18 at 2:39am
ray-andallthatjazz86 said: "Are they bringing the entire cast over from across the pond?"
no
NETWORK#18
Posted: 8/5/18 at 3:33am
I personally think the physical production was too large and too distracting in hindsight. I hope if they transfer they scale it back a little and just make sure the focus is on the only reason everyone is there in the first place: Bryan Cranston.
NETWORK#19
Posted: 8/5/18 at 9:42am
It will be a National production and they Cranston will only do 7 performances a week. First Pacino, who did rotating weeks of 7 and 6 performances; and Midler who did 7; and now Cranston. He's the youngest! Hope this isn't a trend.
NETWORK#20
Posted: 8/5/18 at 9:44am
Left out a word. And they say Cranston will only do 7 performances a week!
NETWORK#21
Posted: 8/5/18 at 9:45am
RippedMan said: "What was altered with Angels? I actually never saw Part 2 on Broadway, so curious if they did the ending the same way."
The stage at the National is much wider and deeper, resulting in some altered design elements and some tricky backstage choreography for entrances/exits. (Specifically, they couldn’t pull the set from the top of part 2 all the way back and offstage on Broadway in the way they did in London.)
Videos
