#2
Posted: 12/6/18 at 3:35pm
Should be interesting if the critic reviews are as polarized as those on here. Could this be like The Cher Show where only one principal actor (Block, Cranston) gets lauded while the rest of the show gets trashed? Will be even more interesting if they both ride poorly-reviewed shows all the way to a Tony Award for themselves.
#3
Posted: 12/6/18 at 4:55pm
Curious to see how this will be reviewed. I saw it yesterday and really loved it. It's not perfect but the thrills FAR outway it's flaws, in my opinion. I would consider it must-see theater.
#4
Posted: 12/6/18 at 4:56pm
For a comparison, here are a few of the London production's reviews:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/14/theater/network-review-bryan-cranston-national-theater.html
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2017/nov/13/network-review-bryan-cranston-lyttelton-national-theatre-lee-hall
https://variety.com/2017/legit/reviews/network-review-bryan-cranston-1202612341/
https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/theatre/network-theatre-review-bryan-cranston-is-astonishing-in-uk-theatre-debut-a3710751.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/14/theater/network-review-bryan-cranston-national-theater.html
https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2017/nov/13/network-review-bryan-cranston-lyttelton-national-theatre-lee-hall
https://variety.com/2017/legit/reviews/network-review-bryan-cranston-1202612341/
https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/theatre/network-theatre-review-bryan-cranston-is-astonishing-in-uk-theatre-debut-a3710751.html
#5
Posted: 12/6/18 at 5:11pm
From what I’ve gathered from the posts on here, some of the things (casting, the sightlines within the theatre) that made the play pop in London have been lost in its transfer across the pond. I’m surprised at the mixed response on here as I expected mostly raves ala The Ferryman. Will be interesting to see what critics say tonight.
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 05:11 PM
#6
Posted: 12/6/18 at 5:47pm
For me, if Goldwyn and Maslany were up to the task I would be raving about it. Instead, I'm just telling everyone Cranston is giving a tour de force performance.
#7
Posted: 12/6/18 at 6:14pm
I agree. Cranston is phenomenal, but the ensemble is not nearly on his level (Maslany, in particular, who I thought was surprisingly not good at all). And that has been pretty much what I've heard from everyone I know who's seen it.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
#8
Posted: 12/6/18 at 8:03pm
Hollywood Reporter is mixed to positive. Doesn't like that it's still set in the 1970s and calls Maslany "miscast," but says it "remains gripping, largely because Cranston makes his character's tragic trajectory a white-knuckle ride."
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/network-theater-1167200
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 08:03 PM
#9
Posted: 12/6/18 at 8:15pm
The Wrap is positive, and highlights a sharp change in tone midway through the show.
https://www.thewrap.com/network-broadway-review-bryan-cranston-conjures-bill-oreilly-paddy-chayevsky-ivo-van-hove/
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 08:15 PM
#10
Posted: 12/6/18 at 8:19pm
Deadline is mixed. Raves for Cranston and calls him "blistering," but says the rest is "something of a let-down, and certainly no improvement over the film." Disliked Goldwyn and Maslany.
https://deadline.com/2018/12/network-broadway-review-bryan-cranston-ivo-van-hove-mad-prophet-1202514424/
Variety is positive. "Fresh fury in a sizzling stage production."
https://variety.com/2018/legit/reviews/network-review-bryan-cranston-broadway-1203081590/
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 08:19 PM
#11
Posted: 12/6/18 at 8:39pm
I think Bryan Cranston is a Tony nom lock at this point
#12
Posted: 12/6/18 at 8:44pm
Chris Kelly for NJ.com is mixed to positive. Calls Cranston "ferocious," but doesn't like that it's still set in the 1970s, saying that the allusions without reference to President Trump means the production "doesn’t entirely hang together."
https://www.nj.com/entertainment/2018/12/network-starring-bryan-cranston-review-a-knockout-take-on-the-classic-movie.html
#13
Posted: 12/6/18 at 8:50pm
TimeOut NY is mixed to negative, giving 3 out of 5 stars. Says Cranston is "an extraordinary actor," but that the rest of the show "isn’t galvanizing, it’s numbing: emptily flashy in its condemnation of empty flash, inhuman in its wan defense of humanity. It has a superb TV star and a killer catch phrase, but behind the sound and fury is only a shadow of significance." "In its rush to the finish line, the show even sacrifices basic storytelling."
https://www.timeout.com/newyork/theater/network
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 08:50 PM
#15
Posted: 12/6/18 at 9:05pm
Terry Teachout for the Wall Street Journal is negative. He says everything surrounding Bryan Cranston has the "unintended effect of turning Network into a one-man show." "If you’re willing to pay Broadway prices to see Mr. Cranston give a tremendous performance, there’s a chance you’ll go home happy. Otherwise, you might as well rent the movie." Also disliked Maslany.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/network-and-the-cher-show-reviews-broadways-recycling-bin-1544148001
#16
Posted: 12/6/18 at 9:30pm
http://theaternewsonline.com/NYTheaterReviews/RATINGSAREPOWER.cfmTheater :
Theater News Online is mixed but leans much more positive than most of these.
#17
Posted: 12/6/18 at 9:48pm
Brantley's rave for the London production in November 2017: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/14/theater/network-review-bryan-cranston-national-theater.html
Brantley for the New York Times on the Broadway production is positive. Critic's Pick seal. A full-on love letter for Cranston, who is "all but flaying the skin off his body."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/06/theater/network-review-bryan-cranston.html
Worth noting that Brantley doesn't so much adore everything else: "If the bravura dementia of his Howard makes much of the rest of the show seem as two-dimensional as a flat TV screen, it’s a trade-off I’m willing to accept, albeit with a sigh."
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 09:48 PM
#18
Posted: 12/6/18 at 9:49pm
amNY is positive, giving 4 out of 4 stars. It "flashes by as quickly as one of the commercials running on one of the countless screens in the background."
https://www.amny.com/entertainment/broadway-review-network-cranston-1.24287410
#19
Posted: 12/6/18 at 9:50pm
Edit: Didn’t see that BroadwayConcierge had already posted the Times
Updated On: 12/6/18 at 09:50 PM
#20
Posted: 12/6/18 at 10:07pm
Good for Nick Wyman, getting a little shoutout from Ben. He would have made a great Max!
#21
Posted: 12/6/18 at 10:07pm
Adam Feldman can drop the mic. His review nailed it.
Just remembering you've had an "and"
When you're back to "or"
Makes the "or" mean more than it did before
#23
Posted: 12/6/18 at 10:45pm
methinks even the positive reviews will fail to sell some tickets
#25
Posted: 12/6/18 at 11:16pm
It is, and I would not expect that to change. But I don't think these reviews will shift it into overdrive.
.jpg?format=auto&width=365)
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $71
Tickets From $71
Tickets From $95