tracker
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
Home For You Chat Register Games Grosses
pixeltracker

NYT article:Harry Potter 68+mil to produce!

NYT article:Harry Potter 68+mil to produce!

dramamama611 Profile Photo
dramamama611
#1NYT article:Harry Potter 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/14/18 at 4:43pm

Wow.

 

(Sorry if this is already posted elsewhere.)


If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Updated On: 4/14/18 at 04:43 PM

BroadwayConcierge Profile Photo
BroadwayConcierge
#2NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/14/18 at 4:48pm

WOW! Setting the $33M theatre renovation cost aside, $35.5M for a production capitalization alone is jaw-dropping. It's paying off, though—the show is terrific.

JBroadway Profile Photo
JBroadway
#3NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/14/18 at 11:49pm

Wait I'm sorry I'm confused. Can someone explain this to me?

(1) What's the different between the capitalization and the actual production cost, and why is the former excluded from the latter, as opposed to being lumped together for the overall cost to produce?

(2) I could have sworn Spider-Man cost $65 Million (hence the "wink-wink" lyric in the Green Goblin's song), so wouldn't that make Harry Potter the most expensive show EVER, non-musical or no?

And if so, (3) how could Harry Potter beat out Spider-Man's cost, when the Spider-Man sets, costumes, lighting, and flying effects were far more elaborate?

rosscoe(au) Profile Photo
rosscoe(au)
#4NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/14/18 at 11:58pm

Insane that nearly every performance is sold out till next March. 


Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist. Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino. This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more. Tazber's: Reply to Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian

sorano916 Profile Photo
sorano916
#5NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/15/18 at 12:47am

JBroadway said: "Wait I'm sorry I'm confused. Can someone explain this to me?

(1) What's the different between the capitalization and the actual production cost, and why is the former excluded from the latter, as opposed to being lumped together for the overall cost to produce?

(2) I could have sworn Spider-Man cost $65 Million (hence the "wink-wink" lyric in the Green Goblin's song), so wouldn't that make Harry Potter the most expensive show EVER, non-musical or no?

And if so, (3) how could Harry Potter beat out Spider-Man's cost, when the Spider-Man sets, costumes, lighting, and flying effects were far more elaborate?
"

Capitalization is the amount the producers and investors have put into the show. The article broke the $35.5 million to include "$11.7 million for the physical production, $7.8 million for “general and administrative” costs, including the design and signage of the facade, $3.4 million for advertising and publicity and $3.2 million for salaries."

Of the $65 million, $33 million was to "clear out and redo the theatre" which, as pointed out in the article, broke down to $23 million to get 'Paramour' out and then $10 million for the actual renovation.

In the NYT article, it says that Spider-Man cost $75 million. 

Updated On: 4/15/18 at 12:47 AM

BJR Profile Photo
BJR
#6NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/15/18 at 9:04am

$23 million to get PARAMOUR out. Wow. The most expensive part of the show was kicking them out. And the costs to kick them out was as much as a huge musical itself, though perhaps not a corporate-backed one. That's incredible.

Call_me_jorge Profile Photo
Call_me_jorge
#7NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/15/18 at 9:10am

I wonder how long the show has to run with it’s current grosses to recoup


My father (AIDS) My sister (AIDS) My uncle and my cousin and her best friend (AIDS, AIDS, AIDS) The gays and the straights And the white and the spades

HogansHero Profile Photo
HogansHero
#8NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/15/18 at 10:27am

Call_me_jorge said: "I wonder how long the show has to run with it’s current grosses to recoup"

We don't seem to know what the nut is, but if we assume (lowball) they net $500k a week, that's 67 weeks. If we assume $750k, that would be about 45 weeks. I'd be inclined to say a year. 

 

BJR Profile Photo
BJR
#9NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/15/18 at 11:28am

And what's wild is that seems quite likely to happen. Even if there are unexpected hiccups along the way, I can't imagine this doesn't keep attracting top ticket prices for a couple years at least.

BroadwayNYC2 Profile Photo
BroadwayNYC2
#10NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/15/18 at 11:40am

I will say, sure the show is a corporate behemoth, but their average ticket price is still reasonable--only the 6th most expensive and within $10-$20 of Come From Away and Wicked. 

Wick3 Profile Photo
Wick3
#11NYT article: 68+mil to produce!
Posted: 4/16/18 at 8:29am

I agree that they have made Harry Potter affordable for the most part. Having seen the view of the balcony, dress circle, and orchestra, even the balcony view there at the Lyric is so much better than the balcony view of other Bway theaters (i.e. St James, Walter Kerr, etc.). 

It's also a show a lot of Harry Potter fans would be willing to see again and again. I know I have plans on seeing it again in June after seeing it back on its first preview. 


Videos